Skip to main content

Full text of "George Steinbrenner"

See other formats



SAC?, Cleveland 
Director, FBIfc 


Airtel. 


473 ? 


i 


AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY 
GEORGE M. STEINBRENNERw^rit^ 
ELECTION LAWS 


(ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION - 
WATERGATE UNIT) 

WFO 



K 




4 . 


V 


3 August * 16 , 1973 


1 - Mr. [ 


] ’b6 
hlC 


Enclosed for Cleveland are the original and one copy 
each of seven subpoenas together with four copies of a memorandum 
dated 8/10/73 received’ from the, office of the Special Prosecjutor . 
Enclosed for Washington Field is one copy of the 8/10/73 .memorandum. 


Cleveland insure that -this case receives the same, . 
immediate and preferred handling as’ have other cases growing, 
out of the Watergate affair* Surep at the very earliest date 
possible. \ 


The office of .the Special Prosecutor has .indicated 
extreme interest in this matter and requests' that the interviews 
be conducted as soon as possible, and as nearly at the fame time 
as possible. Further, it is desired that in the event admissions 
are received from any of the interviewees that they were hot, 
actually the ultimate source of the contribution and that, in 
fact, the corporation actually made the. contribution, a teletype 
summary of such admissions should he’ sent to the Bureau in order 
that the Special Prosecutor's office may :be, informed. Note that 
the thrust of all the interviews; is to determine precisely the 
source of the contribution attributed' to Steinbrenner and* the- 
eight other individuals who are to .be interviewed* 

Enclosures (18) 

^ ^Xssoc.jDlr. . 

Asst. Dir.:* 1 - Washington Field (Enclosure) (Info) 

Admin. _ 


Comp. Syst, 

Files & Com. M 


/ 


Gen. Inv. ^ 
Ident. _ 
Inspection . 
Intel). _ 


laboratory 
Plon. & Eval. w 
Spec. Inv. , _ - 

Training „ 

Legal Coun, - _ 
Cong. Serv. 

Corr.& Crm. 

Research ^ 
gross Off. 

^ephone Rm. 
ctor Sec’y 




. 5 > 




*v. 


'i £ 

I t 




si 


Airtel to SAC, Cleveland 

RE s' AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY" 


Th e enclosed subpoenas sh ould be served, on the 
appropriate ! I should be informed that, 

the office of the; Special Prosecutor will consi der that 
the subpoena has been appropriately answered if | 
will allow FBI, Agents I 


L 


any of 

the Bureau is to. &e immediately advised in order that the 
Special Prosecutor 1 S office’ may *be informed. 


Fa 


xn tne event 
by -FBI Agents 


b3 


Four copies of Cleveland's report should be furnished 
to the Bureau and no copies are to be designated for any - 
U. S'. Attorneys since this case is being handled by the 
Special Prosecutor. Washington Field follow ‘and report 
prosecutive, action, it being noted that the Special Prosecutor 
has determined that venue in this case will lie in the District 
of Columbia. 





2 


/ 



a 





* 


U.S. Departmen^Austice 
Federal Bureau of Investigation 


Washington. D.C. 20535 

muary 14, 1986 



Born: 

Hamilton, Ontario 




In response to your name check inquiry, the central 
files of this Bureau reveal the following information which 
may relate to the subject of your request. 


j was c>ne of, several 

individuals who were the subjects of a criminal-type 
investigation conducted by the FBI from 1973 to 1976. This 
investigation .concerned, the possible violation of Title 18, 
U.S. Code, Sections 3?1 and 610, which pertains to conspiracy 
and illegal corporate contributions. 


while an officer and employee of the 

American Ship Building Company (ASBC) , Cleveland, Ohio, 
received a corporate bonus on the same day that he made, a 
secret contribution to a re-election committee. There is 
attached one copy of an interview conducted with I I 

regarding his participation in this* 


.gfctp&Tf. 


In addition, on April 5, 1974, a fifteen count 
indictment was returned at Cleveland, Ohio, charging the main 
principal in this matter and the ASBC with violations of 
Title 18, Sections 2, 371, 610, 1001, 1503, and 1510, U.S. 
Code. On August 30, 1974, the main principal in this matter 
and the ASBC were sentenced in U.S. District Court, Cleveland, 
Ohio, as follows: the main principal received a $10,000 fine 

regarding violation of Title 18, Section 371, U.S. Code and a 
$5,000 fine for violation of Title 18, Section 3, U.S. Code; 
ASBC received fines of $10,000 each for violation of Title 18, 
Section 371 and 610, U.S. Code. The remaining counts of the 
indictment were dismissed. 


’b6 

h7C 


Original & One - SBA Investigations 
Request Received: 11/4/85 

1 - Mr., 


1 - Ms 
1 - 56-4 


TTT 


(Attn: 


wi RECORDED] 
APR S3 1986 
23 


&:saj (7) 


This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI . It is the property of the FBI 
and is loaned to your agency; tt^and its contents arc not to be distributed outside your agency . This reply 
is result of check of FBI investigative files . To check arrest records t request must be submitted to FBI 
Identification Division. Fingerprints arc necessary for positive check. 



4AUq,:I 





i c\ a \/r» 

iuh f u j t-L 


POI/OOJ 



During the course of this investigation it was 
determined that immunity from prosecutio n was gran ted to eight 
officers and employees of ASBC (of which I I was one), by 

a special prosecutor in this matter. 

The central files of this Bureau contain no 
additional information regarding captioned individual. 



— 'j, 


D J-150 

(Ecf.^4-26-657 


UNITED ST? 


NMENT 


states’ GO^jjij 

Memorandum 


C^SE 


PARTMENT OF JUSTICE 




to : Clarence M. Kelley 
Director 

Federal Bureau of Investigation 

Henry S. Ruth, Jr. C ^^^RBR:RMW:mmj 

Deputy Special Prosecutor \ ./ 

WSPF S>\ d?'- (f 

subject: Campaign Contributions / George M. Steiribrenner * j 

/L-* i ~~ S 
,2- — 2- 

In the course of this office’sAnvestigation ^ 
into violations of 18 U.S.C,. Sec’&i^n 610 (illegal . ' . 

corporate contributions,) and othpr'federal laws, weo 
have- learned that George M'. Sta^nbrenner , Chairman £ 

and Chief Executive Officer or^American Ship Building 





Company, 1210 Investment Plaza, Cleveland, GbSoJ 

Steinbrenner trarismitted'^ithl}is-'Contribution , the 
following »contributions - ^psj ,, S , sumably from company 
employees: 

,tS. 

{4 1. Robert L. ISibbles 

(27,843v Detroit Road, Westlake, Ohio) 
Societys^Jational Bank - $3000 
Clevela(n&, Ohio 
Check 
4/6/_ 

M 




y 


mm 


Central Na 
Cleveland 
Check 
4/7/72 , 



ai * 
# 



CentralVS* 

Lorain, xjl: 
Check #50ti 
4/6/72 y\ 



ty National Bank - 


Cleveland Trust- -, $3500 
Lakewood, Ohio 
Check #1583 
4/6/72 





DOJ— 1973— 04 



5 . 


6 . 


7 - 



Rob er t'Tsar t lome 

(27.4 Sunrise Drive, Amherst, Ohio) . 
Lorain County Savings & Trust - $300.0. 
Amherst, Ohio 
Check #1445. 

4/6/72. 


sk #1445^7 

ixr 


Cleveland Trust - $300.0 
Lorain, Ohio 
Check #1544 
4 / 6/72 


Cleveland\ 
Check #15 
4/6/7 2 X 


1st - $100. 


8 . 


Daniel Kissl 

(37849 Lake Drive, Avon, Ohio) 

Cleveland Trast -^$3500 
Lorain, Ohio V/V 
Check #604 
4/6/72 

Gordon Stafford 
(20328. Parklane Drive, Rocky River, Ohio) 
Cleveland Trust - $29.00 
Rocky River , Ohio 
Check #429 
4/7/72 


be 

b7C 


TOTAL: $25., 000 

We request the FBI to question Steinbrenner 
and each of the eight smaller contributors concerning 
the complete circumstances' surrounding these contributions. 
In particular, an agent should question each concerning 
the amount of the contribution; the date, of the 
contribution; the precise source of the funds; who 
solicited the contribution; the complete circumstances, 
surrounding the solicitation; who delivered the contribution, 
to whom, when and where; what if any representations 
were made to the contributor about possible reimbursement,, 
direct or indirect,, immediate, or deferred, and by whom. 

In addition, the agent should determine from each 



- 3 - 




whether the individual made other political contributions 
in 1972,. whether he made political contributions in 1968, 
and the complete circumstances surrounding these. 

Further, the agent should question each concerning the 
sources and forms of all compensation (including salary, 
bonus, stock options, and fringe benefits) from his 
company or other sources for the years 1968 through 
1972. Finally, the agent should determine the name 
and address of all banks at which each individual had 
any account or safe, deposit box from January 1, 1972 
to. date-. 



Attached are subpoenas duces tecum for the 


b7D 


i Please investigate, all reasonable leads 
I arising out of this investigation. 

If further clarificatio n of this inve stigative be 
request is needed, please contact | | of this k7c 
office. 



c 

NR 009 CV CODE 


*10:45 PM NITEL^ 8-2 0-73 JSM 
TO^DIRECTOR , FBI 
WASHINGTON FIELD 
FROM CLEVELAND (56-83) (P) 


BUR WU OF IWESJ&\TION 

communications sQon 

AUG 2 01973 

t^etypex^ 


f ^AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY., GEORGE M'i^TEINBRENNER, 
ELECTION LAWS (ACCOUNTING. AND FRAUD SECTION - WATERGATE UNIT) 
00: WFO. b7c __ 


RE BUREAU AIRTEL TO CLEVELAND, 8/16/73, 
APPROPRIATE 


| Assoc. Dir. _ 
Asst.Dir.: 

pdmin. 

. Comp. Sy$t. 


| Inspection 

* Intell. 

| Laboratory - 
i Plan. & Eval. __ 
^ Spec. Inv. 

Training 

i 

I Legal Coun. 

| Cong. Sorv. i 

j Corr. & Crm. 1 
| Research ^ ^ ^ 

Press Off. 

Telephone Rm. 
Director Sec*y 1 * 



SERVED. WITH SUBPOENAS IN INSTANT MATTER ON 


8/20/73. ARRANGEMENTS MADE WITH 



OF CONTENTION RE PERTINENT SUBPOENAS SERVED 

i 

(1) THE REQUEST- FOR 


OCLOWING POINTS 


r a AUG 24 1973 



END PAGE ON 

qb^ 



r 






*■ ****£ > 

CV- 56-83 




H&. 7"1 



(2) THE ISSUING OFytfHE SUBPOENA! 



(3) THE INCLUSION OF 



N ONE SUBPOENA, 0/^? 


SPECIFICALLY 




\Sdlid 

I ALSO" EXPRESSED THE DESIRABILITY OF ADVISING THE 



\Sdtid 

advising the — J 

€>/v b ate 

]]THE SUBPOENAS 5 

\S &O+06- W A® r4^ 


WAS QUESTIONED SPECIFICALLY’ AS TO WHETHER THE 


ABOVE POINTS WOULD INHIBIT | 


SUBPOENAED 

THAT 

‘ 1 "7 

SUBPOENAS* 


]WHEREUP0N ;HE . ADVISED. THAT THEY WOULD NOT AND 

IN RESPONSE TO THE 


IT ISj^NOTED THE 


OF SUBPOENAS 


as they will be specifically interviewed; re instant: matters 


PERTAINING TO 



FBI HQ FLC ACK FR ONE' TEL. CLR 







0 


Aw $ • sf 






♦* 



CV 56-83 
PAGE TWO 




,IT WAS REITERATED TO 

that THE OFFICE OF THE special PROSECUTOR WILL CONSIDER THAT 

THE SUBPOENAS HAVE BEEN APPROPRIATELY ANSWERED IF 





T 


STATED THAT 


WAS 


AWARE OF THIS; HOWEVER, WOULD NOT ANSWER THE SUBPOENAS FOR THE 
REASON SET FORTH ABOVE. 


IN ADDITION, STATED INTENT OF 



OF THE RECEIPT 


OF SUBPOENAS 



WILL BE DISCUSSED 


FUTHER WITH DEPARTMENTAL ATTORNEY[ 


AS BUREAU IS 

AWARE, COMPREHENSIVE INTERVIEWS OF 



CANNOT BE CONDUCTED UNLESS 

! 



b3 

•b6 

b7C 


CLEVELAND NOT EXPERIENCING ANY DELAY TO DATE WITH OTHER 


BUREAU REQUESTED TO BRING ABOVE MATTER TO THE ATTENTION , 



OF DEPARTMENT. ‘ I 

"tT , . 

END ' stjiribtf 










0 


g &<>. c ^ IM&l G>di^A$ 




4 t 


REC-49^- y737-f 


August 28, 1973 - 
BY COURIER SERVICE 


I V 


EX* 105 


AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY 
GEORGE H. STEIHBREHNER 
ELECTION LAWS 


This will confirm the discussion of August 27, 1973, 
between Mr. | Hof the Spec ial Prosecutor* s Office 

and Special Agent I b f the FBI. Mr .. I I was 

advised the Cleveland FBI Office on August 24, 1973, recontacted 


to ascertain the status of | requ ested bv 

subpoenas issued by the Special Prosecutor's Office. ~ 
advised he has not yet received a letter from the Special Prose-? 
cutor's Office to autho rize disclosure of the I 

~l He stated that upon instructions of 


r? «*> • 
S co 


after receipt of the anticipated letter from the Special, Prose- 
cutor's Office and upon the arrival of Sept ember 12, 1973, the 
date listed on the subpoenas, the bank wil l| 

I but not before. 

; , Mr. I I advised that the letter to I ~1 

r l has not been sent as yet and in light of the 

ffdregoing informat ion, a new subpoena with return date of 

I will be immeidately forwarded for service 


2 S=? ' [ Mr. I I was advised that l | 

j <=£ | | American Ship Building Company (ASBC) , and 

He bert oar txome. General Secretary of that firm, have been infer- 
viewed and furnished signed statements in which they advise of 
receipt of checks drawn on the payroll account of ASBC in amounts 

A.. 0 <r, ot, similar to. or identical to the amounts: of their campaign contri- 

butions on of about April 6, 1972. However, each of these men 

0 , 1 ,,%;;,: claims these contributions were in no way solicited by any cora- 
f.i« & co m . _pany officials and that the sizeable payroll checks were gonpany 
It r ""-b onuses which just happened to be disbursed at that time. Each 
impaction __of these men stated his contribution was motivated by the avail- 
int." — — ability of personal funds and their desires to financially support 
p^'i^^the Nixon Administration which each felt best represented their 
Spec, (nv. .//"I nterests and those of the company. 

Training r 


1 - Cleveland (56-83) 

. MAIL ROOM 1 lX TELETYPE U1 


ELETYPE.UNITCZ3 


EEftOTE PAGE TWO . . . 



•*4 ■ 



-fv> 

Is'' 



American Ship Building Company 


It was pointed out to Hr . T 
additional of floors’ of' 3V5BC woulcT 


ponding tho obtain incr of I 
I I Xlr^r 


[ that interviews for 
need to bo hold in abevanco 


lotatcd that in. view of the dolays 

li 


encountered | f lit- would be desirable that all of 

these officers be interviewed during tho week of August 27-31 ? 
1973' r to obtain as much information as possib le oven .though 




Iri view* of tho. above, the Cleveland Office has been 
instructed tO irr.ndio.tely interview the reraining officers of 
ASfec and submit a report as soon as possible.. The results, 
of fheso interviews Will be furnished to the Special Prosdr 
cutor l s Office as soon as they are received. 

This document contains neither recorrondations nor 
conclusions of the PBX. If is the property of the FBI and. is 
loaned to your agency* it and its contents are not to be dis- 
tributed outside y$ur agency.* 

* t 


b3 

■bo 

b7C 


NOTE: Original and one forwarded t6 Special Pro'secutor J 'A Office 
by O-l^j this -date ; one^ copy .each to -WFQ and Cleveland .by 6-7, 
for .information,, this- date.' * / ■ 


0^-8/27/73 j SA 
SAC Frederick Fehl, 0V, 


__ 1 telephonically advised 

Of the results or above discussion, 

SAG Fehl advised the interviews will -be. scheduled, at once and 


report submitted at ‘the earliest possible date.. 


b6 

hlC 


- 2 ' 



■9 


FEDERAL BUREAU, OF IJJIYESTIGATION 

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION 

AUG2W3 

TELETYPE 


C 



NR 012 CV CODE 

11:05 Pfo NITEL 8-24-73 SLO 
TO DIRECTOR 

WASHINGTON FIELD OFFICE 



FROM CLEVELAND 


56-83 


l 


Assoc. Dir. 
Asst. Dir.: 
Admin. _ 


Comp. Syst. _ 
Files & Com. 

Gen. Inv. 

Idont. — . . — 

Inspection 

Intoll. 


% 

~v / 


Laboratory ____ 

Plan. & Eval. 

Spec. Inv. 

Training 

Legal Coun. 

Cong. Serv. - 

Corr. & Crm. 
Research 

Press Off. 


Telephone Rm. I 

Director Sec*y 


AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY, GEORGE M* STEINBRENNER* ELECTION LAWS 
(ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION - WATERGATE UNIT) 00: WFO 

RE CLEVELAND TEL OF 8/21/73. 


ON 8/24/73 J 



i 


REQUESTED VIA INSTANT 

NOT YET RECEIVED A LETTER FR0MJE1 
Nt- r.-49 


TO FB 


1 


RECONTACTED TO ASCERTAIN 



(ADVISED HE STILL HAS b 

b 

Tmr.nTsr.i nsiiRir mr b7c 


,*3 7 
• * 




PER 


UPON ARRIVAL OF 


OcM 

DATE LISTED ON. THE SUBP 




iPOENASj 


*5)0 — 


END PAGE ONE 

* 


t v /io 




AND NOT .BEFORE. IT IS NOTED 

■ uw. 

let Cf.lAlW 


1 Qt\j 




00 ^ 



ft 


V 






CV 56-83 


I, PAGE TWO 

I 



BUREAU REQUESTED TO BRING ABOVE DESCRIBED MOST RECENT STIPULATION 



AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY (AMSHIP) AND ROBERT BARTLOME, GENERAL 
SECRETARY,. AMSHIP, INTERVIEWED AND IN SIGNED STATEMENTS CONFIRM RECEIPT 


OF CHECKS DRAWN ON PAYROLL ACCOUNT OF AMSHIP SIMILAR OR IDENTICAL TO 
THE AMOUNTS OF THEIR CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS* ON OR ABOUT 4/6/72; 

HOWEVER, EACH CLAIMS THE CONTRIBUTIONS WERE>IN NO WAY SOLICITED BY ANY 
COMPANY OFFICIALS AND THAT THE SIZEABLE ■ PAYROLL CHECKS WERE COMPANY 
BONUSES WHICH JUST HAPPENED TO BE DISBURSED AT THAT TIME* EACH STATED 
CONTRIBUTION WAS MOTIVATED MERELY BY THE AVAILABILITY OF PERSONAL FUNDS 

AND THEIR OWN DESIRES TO FINANCIALLY SUPPORT THE NIXON ADMINISTRATION 
WHICH EACH FELT BEST REPRESENTED THEIR INTERESTS AND THOSE OF AMSHIP. 
CLEVELAND. AWAITING AVAILABILITY OF ADDITIONAL ! 


END PAGE TWO. 


0 


-1 


fi 


0 


CV 56-83 
PAGE THREE 

"[ prior to 

INTERVIEW. 


BUREAU WILL BE KEPT ADVISED OF PERTINENT 
DEVELOPMENTS. 

P 

END 

MSI FBIHQ ACK 4 


b3 

b6 

b7C 



PLS HOLD FOR ONE 


UNITED STATES GOvWnMENT - 

Memorandum 


m 


EPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 


TO 



SUBJECT: 


Clarence M. Kelley * date: 8/2.7/73 ' 

Director 

Federal Bureau of Investigation 
Attn: , Accounting and Frauds Section 
Henry S. Ruth, Jr. 

Deputy. Special Prosecutor 
Watergate. Special Prosecution Force 

o 

Campaign Contributions / .George M. Steinbrenner 


With reference to: our investigative 
request of August 10 ,\ 1973/ we are sending three. 


new. subpoenas duces tecum to 

] which are returnable on September 4,. 1973 •' 


b7D 


These subpoenas, which are encteed, are part of 
the. investigation which we outlined in the August 
10 ‘investigative requsst .. 

If further, clarification of t his investiga- ff \y 
tive request JLs needed, please contact |_ 
of this office. 

Attachments. 





BEfiMS 



o 





- V737-S 


IS 


mm 


DOJ — 1973^-04 



24, 3.973 




»•> 

( 


0 


«r ^ 


t? 


/ 


Airtel 


8-29.-73 


TO: 

PROM: 


SAC, Cleveland (56-83) 

-r y 7*7 -O 


1. - Mr. 


Jo 6 
hlC 


AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY 
GEORGE M. STEINBRENNER 
ELECTION LAWS 
L / (ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION - 
-4/ WATERGATE UNIT) 

» 00: WFO. 


4 ReBuairtel 8-16-73, and urtel dated 8-24-73. 

Enclosed for Cleveland are two copies of a memorandum 
dated 8-27-7-3, together with t he original and one copy each of 


three subpoenas for service on f 

One copy of the 8-27-73, memorandum is enclosed for wfo. 


Note the return date' of the enclosed subpoenas is 
and further, that by lett er dated 8-24-73, the Office 
of the Special Pros ecutor advisedl ~l 

th at Special Agents I l are authorized 


to[ 


Jsubpoenaed by the grand jury. 


Bureau should continue to be. kept, informed of 
significant developments and any problems encountered in. 
completing this investigation. 

Enclosures (8) 

1 - SAC, WFO (info) (Enclosure) 


b3 

•be 

b7C 


Assoc. Dir. , 
AssN Dir.? 
A<Wn. 


CANraat OjfK 
(5) 


Comp. Syst. ^ 
Files & Com. , 
G©o. Inv. 

(jent. , r 

Inspection 

Intell* — — _ - 

Laboratory 

Plan. & Eval. . 
Spec. Inv. -~ a -- 
Trolnlng _. 1 . . - ^ 


Legal Coun, 

Cong, Serv. _ _ ^ .. 
Corr. & Crm. 
Research „ 

Pres* Off. 

Telephone Rm, — . 
Director $ec*y 


•2 s 

i 0 SEP. 


MAILED 20 * 

i*AUG-2 91973 

* 

•5*^ FBI 


MAIL ROOM 



TELETYPE UNIT r~l 




FCiW 


•~G UV.T 



’b6 

hlC 





% 


- « 

Aii; tel 



1- Mf •, 


TO: 


SACjJ^veland (56-83) 


FROM: Directorial 



AMERICAN" SHIP BUILDING COMPANY 
GEORGE M. STEINBRENNER 
ELECTION LAWS 

(ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION - 
WATERGATE UNIT) 

00: WFtf ' 



9/5/73 


* 


Rerep of SAj 


datecl 8/30/73 at Cleveland. 


be 

b7C 


Enclosed for receiving offices, are two copies each of 
a, revised 'Table of Contents which should he' substituted for. 
the original Table of' Contents in. rerep. In the future 
please, list .enclosures for the Special Prosec utor^ Office 
following the synops is of ,a report-' Also, as 
I | nay possibly become the besp avaixao±e " 

- evidence in a court proceeding,, they should have been initialed 
Add dated, by the Agent who obtained, them. In the- future, 
please conform to this practice. * 

‘fi L 

t 

.^j^closjft^s. ( 2 ) , 

* l-> WFO (Enclosures 2). 


b3 


Assotr.Djr. 

’ Asst. Dtr.; 

Fjl«V& Com. ^ 
>Gen. Inv. 

J fdenh - 

Inspection , - - - 
Intflf, _.n— _ F 
Laboratory 
Plon. & Evol ^ 
'Spec. Iny, 
’Training 
UegoJ.Coyn.j, 

Cong, Serv, 

Corr. & Crm, 

" Research , 

. Pro s'? 1 Off. „ 
"Telephone Rm, : 

! Director Sec'y „ 


MAILED 22 


S EP 05 1973 * 




MAIL ROOM 


TELETVPE.UNIT ED 





, Jims: EURKQ HE 18SESTIGAT10N 
COMMUNICATIONS. SECTION 

: CP O'- 1373 

Y tECEtyPE 


NR 005 CV CODE 

9:20 PM URGENT 9-4-73 JSM 

TO DIRECTOR, FBI 


FROM CLEVELAND (56-83) (P) 6P 


Vssoc. 

t. Oir.-\gw»’k 


Corr. & Crm. 
Research _ -I 

Press Off. 

Telephone Rm. — I 
Director Sec'y 


AMERICAN SHJP BUILDING COMPANY* GEORGE M.^STEINBRENNER, 
ELECTION LAWS (ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION - WATERGATE UNIT). 


RE CLEVELAND REPORT OF SA 

BUREAU TELCALL 9/4/73. 

PURSUANT TO SUBPOENA SERVED ON 


OF 8/30/73, AND 



END PAGE ONE 




4 


o 


0 


* 1 

CV 56-33 
PAGE SIX 

b3 

b6 

b7C 


bureau will note that the amounts of the campaign 

CONTRIBUTIONS WERE SET FORTH IN THE DEPARTMENTAL MEMO WHICH 
INITIATED THIS INVESTIGATION. 

IN MOST CASES, THE AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY 
OFFICERS INTERVIEWED DID NOT RECALL THE SPECIFIC NAMES OF 
THE COMMITTEES TO WHOM THE CONTRIBUTIONS IN THE FORM OF 
CHECKS WERE DIRECTED OR MADE PAYABLE TO. FURTHER DETAILS 
OF THE ACCOUNTS “REGARDING THE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS ARE 
SET FORTH IfTTHE RESPECTIVE INTERVIEWS OF THESE OFFICERS, 
WHICH ARE INCLUDED IN THE REFERENCED REPORT. 



END 

FBIHQ FLC ACK FR ONE TLEL CLR 



*9*rk 

•^v 



, Pi ssemj notion Record of Attached Report y. / Notations * 

I (2, zvht&S 


D-MWL 2 - 09-2010 


L Request Reed. 
; pate^Fwd. 
Row Fwd. 



AIF TIH OREATIOH CONTAINED ' 
HFRFT 1 .I IS UNCLASSIFIED EXCEPT^ 

where' shoot otherwise 


[PEP! 


-? ?^h 


COVER PAGE 


j£SBE»»wnr 






















!, 

<* I " * * ' ~ * 


CV56-83 


£ 


b3 


Jt 


ADMINISTRATIVE 

, * * ■ & b : ~ 

Tvjo copies of instant report being designated for 
WFO which according to referenced Bureau airi&el is to follpw 
and report prosecutive action. WFO note that no,c popies are 
being disseminated to any US Attorneys as this matter being 
handled by Special Prosecutor’. , • * 


Bureau* note that the [ 


For Information of the Bureau; [ 

' i 3 • 2 La. 3 jlAl n lx vtn 


X'WA XUXV/XIUM'UXWtl y* yv4*.vwv*j I 

has been contacted for at least two years during, the course. ;of 
any criminal or security matters involving members: -of .the 
American Ship jBuiidihg Company, Do rain, Ohio^ where' 


employed as the. 


3 


is 


BA^TLOME, 


Cleveland indices, negative regarding ROBERT- E;. 


, AUGUST KISSE L. 



b3 


b6 

blC 

b7D 


■% 


, . B 

COVER PAGE 




t , 



FD-204 (Rev. 3-3-59) 


O 


d 


UNITED* STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; 


Copy to: 


Report of: 

Date: 

FieId»Offiee File .jfe 
Title: 


SA| 

8/W7T 

56-83 


b6 

b7C 


Office: CLEVELAND 


Bureau File #: 


AMERICAN' SHIP BUILDING- COMPANY., 
GEORGE M.. STEINBRENNER 


Character: 


-ELECTION 'LAWS 


.Synopsis: 


Subpoenas served on-f 


for 


as of 


I 


The counsel 
i/24 /73 (took 


b3 

bo 

b7C 


1 


the position ] 

requested by the subpoenas .until ,9/12/73 and Until receipt of 
written corifirDiation fiom the USDJ.. The pertinent officers or 
employees of th<e American Ship Building Company or their respective 
subsidiaries were interviewed and in signed statements all 
furnished, their recollections regarding the circumstances of 
their contributions to NIXON campaign committee on or about 
4/6/72. Each interviewee stated' he- received accompany bonus 
around the same time that, he made the contribution but claimed 
that their- contributions were all of desires and in no 

way were motivated or solicited by GEORGS' 1-f. STEINBRENNER or- 
any other comfiany officials. Each official advised, he wrote- his 
campaign contribution varying in amounts from $2800 to $3500 on 
a personal check and gave the check to ‘'ROBERT BARTLOME, General 
Sa cra tarv of the company,, who reportedly then gave- the checks 


to 


i 

allegedly handcarried the cnecKS to Washington , D.C. Available 
'bank records indicated the deposit of the company bonus phecks 
in the personal checking accounts of company officials; howeyer, 
these interviewed stated that they would have made contributions 
to the NIXON campaign regardless of the receipt, of their bonuses. 

- P - 


with, the company, who 


bo 

b7C 




This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency: it and its contents 
are not Jto be distribuied outside your agency. 


V. S, GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1S70 0*406-840 



NTERVIEW 


3-18 



OF ROBERT LYONS DIBBLE 



19-38 

35-56 

57-61 

62-78 

79-83 

84-87 

88-92 

93-97 


ENCLOSURES:' For the Office of the Special Prosecutor,, 

U. S. Department of Justice, Washingto n, D. C, 
| | of the 

following official s of the American Ship 

Building Company: I 




:cy 56-83 


i . t ■ 

DETAILS: : : k ' - , • ' 

PREDICATION 

- ' * 

Investigation in this mattei* is predicated up op 
receipt Of a fetter directed tp the Director of 'the FBI 
.dated. August. £0> 1973 frprii the Deputy Special Prose'cut’oy.,. 

Ufi.SSf Department, of Justice;, requesting ah . investigation' into 
a campaign cOhtribption matter r egaiding GEOROE Mi STEINBRENNER 



fP -302 {REV. 1 1 * 2 7 - 7 OJ 

*: s i 

0 0 

FEDERAL BUREAU Ofc INVESTIGATION 


Dnle of !rnn«cr!ptIon 8 •*_27*T 7 3 


was contacted at 


useless* 

£ the identity of 




I \ was adyised by 3& I [ that the office, 
of the special prosecutor j Washington, p . C . wpuld cons ider 
the- subpoena as having been appropriately answered if I 


Combanyi Lorain,. Ohio.which firm 


irm is manage 


inlervjewed-on 


.Dole dictated. 


IMs document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions ot the F8I. It is the' properly o( the F8| ond^s loaned to -your agency* 
it and its contents ore not jo be distributed outside y.our ogen^y, ^ ■ 











Fjp'302 iREy . tiWO)' ' 
; ^ 

. u ■ Q 

• ***? 

.FEDERAL BUREAU 'OF INVESTIGATION 

* 

t 

% 

% 

t)ale of transcription, 

Pursuant -to- serving? a Federal subpoena on 


Interviewed on 


r ^leYglapdi Ohio ^ * Cleveia^d: 5&>83 


^Dote dictated* 


Thl$« document contains neither* recommendations nor conclusions^ o( jheTBI, 1( if tKe properly pf Ihe FBI pn<£ is, loaneddo your"- agency 
It and* Us contents are not tovbe distributed outside your .qg^ricy. . “ 




FD-302. (REV. J 1-27-70) 


0 


0 


FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 


Date of trnrigef Intlon 8 ** 27 **7 3 


Lorain, Ohio, was interviewed, in tile executive office, 
area of the Americ an Shipbuilding Company^ Lorain » Ohio, 
in the- presence of 
for that firm. 


arid 


were advise d of. the ideri- 

as Special Agents 


titles of ^ 

(SAs) of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and b.oth 
were, advised that; the matter under investigation concerned 
a possible violation of election laws, specifically campaign 
contributions and the .finding of campaign contributions by 
corporations through officers of the corporation of private 
individuals. ‘ 


\ [was, thereafter orally advised; of 
and furnished in “Interrogation; Advice 


*Jr . 

ids rights J>y ,SA_ - ... - 

of Rights!* form which he read,, stated be underst ood and 
than sighed with , th e concurren ce pf for. l I who stated 

that neither he nof 


had any reluctance to sign. 


_Thereafter[ 


]was questioned by SAs 


and I concerning a campaign contribution mhde by him 


via .a A3,200 check dated .April 6,. 1972. for the campaign of 
• RIChM)' M. ftlXQN. 

At the conclusion, of the intervi ew the follow ing 
* ; ' - ' ' [any 


41 


Wiir .V»< 

statement was prepared,, read by f [ an; , , . . 

corrections; requested were made., and thereafter the state- 
ment was- signed.. ... - 

The statement reads as follows: 

V" ^ **Lorain, Ohio 


be 

b7C 


Interview 


'.?<* on -8-^3-73 


-°i. , ..Lorain,.. Ohio . 


byl 



BAs 

and 


f* - 

- 

. ■ - MVHiklsii- - 

I 


_Date dictated. 


.Fiio * . Clevel and. 56-83 
0-21-73. 


b6 

’ b7C 


Ihif document contain* neither cecommendotfqn* nor conclusion* oUhe-FSt Jl Iheproperjy of/the FBI end, Is loaned to your .agency; 
-ji and' ( it^ contend lar^ 'noS (6 be dfct(jbuted ©ujside^youf agency* 

i ■. f i . - , 



f * * 


o 





CV 56-83 

s ' 


“August 23, 1973, 




free and volunt ary statement to 


fur nish the follow ing 


and 


who have identified themselves, to 

me as Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of Inyes,- 
tigation (FBI) v I have been advised that I* am being 
interviewed concerning a possible violation of 
election laws matter, specifically an April 6, 1972, 
contribution by .me to the campaign of RICHARD NIXON". 

“I have been orally advised of my rights and 
furnished an “Interrogation; Advice of Ri ghts** 
form which 1 have read in the presence of 


| for the American Ship Building Company. 

I fully understand my rights and the rights form and 
have voluntarily signed the f orm. 


be 

b7C 


“ I have been employed at the American Ship 
Building Compan y since. Janua ry, 1965, in late 1965 
I was appointed I | ahd .in 1969 X was appointed 

| of the company. 


“Regarding my April, 1972, campaign contribution 
X make the following observations? 


"The contribution was made in the amount of 
$3,200,00 (dollars) in. the form of a check dr awn on 
the joint account of me and | . 

“I. do not recall the specific, date of the contri- 
bution other than the fact that the contribution was made 
prior to a new campaign contributions law going into, 
.effect. The only aspect of the new law I was con- 1 
cerned with was the fact that when the law went into 



CV 56-83 
3 


effect a contribution and the source of same - could 
be public information. 

"The source of the funds covering my contri- 
bution in the; amount of $3, 200 was a bonus- from Amer- 
ican Ship Building Company in the net amount of 
$3,050.00 which was paid to me in, the form of’ a 
company check on the payroll account which is the 
only method by which American Ship- Building Com- 
pany disburses bonuses. 

- "The contribution,, was' not solicited by anyone 
either privately or thru the company and merely 
was motivated by my own desire to*f inancially support 
the. administration which I thought best represented 
my interests and those of the American Ship Building 
Company, X did not get or expect to receive anything 
in return for my contribution .other than the continua- 
tion of the NIXON Administration. Specifically* 
President NIXON* s administration had been responsible 
for the passage of the U.S. Maritime Act of 1970 , 
which was of significant help to shipping and ship 
construction on the Great Lakes. 

"Prior to my making the, contribution there had 
been much, discussion among company employees regards . 
ing making political contributions and political 
activity and campaign, contributions were encouraged 
by GEORGE STEINBRENNER, Chairman of the Board and 
Chief Executive officer. I had mentioned my* desire 
to a number of other executive officers including 
ROBERT BARTLOKE, who, I believe* discussed the - subject 
with STEINBRENNER , as BARTLONE produced the names of 
a number of committees,., perhaps 6 to 12 in number* 




® at* 


% 






CV 56-83 

4 


•which committees 'were a means to contribute to the 
NIXON campaign* BARTLOJIE .mentioned something to' 
the effect that the list was. a list of committees - 
provided by GEORGE S.TEINBRENNER' that we might 
Contribute to. There “was no specific' meeting 
convened for the purpose of soliciting contribu- 
tions. I Wrote my check and gave the check to 
ROBERT BARTLOME, secretary ojf the .company as he 
was *the individual the checks were being given 
to as. it seemed that BARTLOME was the individual 
-Who Would see that -the checks got to their destina- 
tion. There was. ho specif ic request that the 
contributions be in the form of. checks; however, 

I am not aware of any cash contributions* 

•‘Another reason for my making the contribution 
was the fact that ,1 was financially iri a position 
-to make such a contribution. X know of no connection 
or relationship between -the issuance, of the company 
bonuses and, the giving of the campaign contributions* 
I believe there are spine company employees who 
received bonuses but who -did hot contribute. 

“.I gave my personal check to BARTLOME, who was 
Collecting the other checks and I understand the 
checks were taken to. Washington, D.C* ,. but X do 
hot know toojk the checks there. Apparently 
the checks were personally transported because of 
the impending deadline f or the new law which was 
a few days away. 

“There was no statement or any kind of repre- 
sentation made to me by anyone, about any lcihd' o£ 
any reimbursement, Consideration, or ..anything^ of ' 
value, direct or indirect, immediate or deferred, 



0 


CV 56-83 
5 


regarding my making ,or not making a campaign con- 
tribution to. either the NIXON campaign or any - 
other local, state,'. or Federal election, 

”1 also 5 recall making a . $1,000' and a $2,000 
contribution both in personal checks. One of the . 
contributions Tins to the democratic Party and the 
other was either for a Republican or Democratic 
campaign dinner, I also recall making two contri- 
butions in the amount of $500 and $750 to the 
Congressional campaign -of CEAR3LFS KOSHER the 
Republican Congressman from. Oberlin, Ohio.- 




:b3 

be 

b7C 


‘•The above statement represents the accurate 
account of my knowledge, of the circumstances. 

. regarding my April, 1.972, campaign contribution. 

X have n6f .discussed my- statement or responses 
to possible questions regarding my contribution 
and I have not' been coached or otherwise told 
how to respond. 

"X have read the 'above statement consisting 
of this page and three other, pages and. certify 
that the above is. true to: the best of my know- 
ledge.; 


’'Witnesses; 


!7s/ 


August 23, iy/3 


7 s/ 

/s/ SA 


[FBI, 


Jo 6 
b7C 


fa/ SA 


Cl eveland. Ohio 8/ 23/73 


Special 


Agent, FBIj Cleveland 8/23/73” 


ladyised that since approx- 
imately 1967 his salary has increased from, around $15,0.00 
to his. present; $20 ,000 to $27,000 salary* He advised that 
he is interested in keeping his present position with 
American Ship and maintaining his salary and with regard 
to supporting various candidates of either party he would 





» I 




CV 56-83 

A 


Eyes 

Hair 

Employment 


Blue 

Brown 


Social Security^ 
Account Number; 
Education 

Military Service 


Address' 

Home telephone 
number 
Relatives! 

Wife. 

Son 

Daughters 


American snipbuilding Company 
Lorain, .Ohio ^ . 


Lorain, Ohio 



-After having read and signed the prepared state- 
^requested a photostatic copy of the state- 


ment* 

ment and was furnished the same* 


be 

.b7C 



FD-3024REV. U-Z? t 70) 


0 


a 


FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 


.X 


•Ocrle'pf transcription.. 


8/22/73 


V. 


^ I y as contacted at hla piano ofcwnlnyrceflt 

on tne afternoon pf August 21> 1973. ' 


be 

b7C 


was advis ed O f the identit-Teg off 


■agents of the. EBI* . 


and 


as Special" 


] 


b6 

h!C 


wa3 presented with a subpoena 


5{f®' 2 j. ^ecu^ piit ed States DistrictCoa-rt fftsrtM -r^-n 

line District of Columbia, f 



Iwas’adviced hv sAf 


*»« »' ^3 


W cunsxaorea -as appropriately answered 


that the subpoena ■will 


to nonsuit With [ 


At, th is’ point. 


requested to be permitted 
phfeh-lve did. privately*. 


agents as’ the 


Shortly the reafter, / returned^alohg ! jrLth 

— Uo ta to CT io WinB 


b7C 


be 

b7C 


1 

[produced the .original and a, carbon copy 
Pion directed to the PBI. Setting, forth 

ae Subpoena would Ihft Ohrmi rlAYteri ml -t ah 

of’ a ■written, confirma; 
the above fact that tl 

With 4fl 



?he above described statement wgis read by the inter- 
viewing age nts and thereaf ter signed with the Original beirig_ 
returned tc \ pn , d ,the...o a r b on,.copy,retained-bv. , £ A . 


b6 

b7C 


-Interviewed on.. ,. 8/21/73 

sasI 


by. 


and! 


- Ohio, . _■ - . j . , — r Fil ° * — C - l € y e land-56 ^ $3 



□ 


' 

* -bo 

j'MVII/mrw 


^Oote dictated — _ 

— 8/22/73 

b7C 


This .document contoins neither teCommendolions. nof conclusions of jhe FjSI. M U (he property of the F8I ond |s loaned lo^your agency;" 
it ond Its *con)ents <*f® not ter be^ distributed outside your .agency. _ 



CV ,56-83 


I |were advised by 

SAl fchat the assigni ng of th e above; described states 
raent merely confirmed SA| ^statement: regarding the 
answering of the subpoena and Xliat the agents could not , 
speak for or directly represent the Uhlted States district 
Court as 




stipuj 


heri providedf 


was Questioned as to th 


Indicated that these items could be - 
obtained,, and he did obtain copies of these two- above described 
items. ' - 




FO-302 IUA70) - 

• i> , 

M.- «. 

^ r 

a o 

■e - * ' ' " - - 

FEDERAL BUREAU -OF INVESTIGATION 

* - * * ~ 

" 

Dote of transetiplfon, 



as aayiaea ox snexaett 
ervjLowlng agents and the fact that they h 




Interviewed oo_„ 8/21/73= 
SASf 


.Amherst 3 Ohio 


'RJft/inrw 


.Datodlclaled, 


.Fji. * Cleveland 56-83 

* 

8/22/73 


This docu/nejit contains npjth^r recomme.ndotfon$ nor conclusions offhe/FBK ft is Ijje 'properly pf "the FBI ancMs/loaned foyour ogency; 
il ond; its" .contents .gre, hot to be distrjb^ted^oulsjde your ogency. 


f~: .93 










Interviewed on, - 8-/28/73 ‘ 
by _„-^ 


-at- 


* ^ ~ 

- Elyri a ., Ohio, 


-File # _ nipv^iand 56-83 


bo ’ 

kmab - - - = b7c 


..Dale dictated — 8 / 30/73 


Thfr document contains neither recommendations ho^r concfuslojU o( the F8X It' is the properly of the"F8l.and is loaned-to your agency; 
* it““.aod, its contends afe not lo%be ^distributed ‘bulsidj your agency * * 

80 - ■ - 






*0-302 (Rev. 11-27-70) 


FEDERAL BUREAU. OF INVESTIGATION 


- 8/29/73 

Dalo of transcription - 

ROBERT E . y'jsrRTF rfiME- was contacted at-his-pl-ace-of — — ■ 
employment, American' Ship Building- Company, X l prain J . v ph±Q, • 
at which time he furnished, the following signed statement:* 

m J. 7 A * ^ * '-w*-*' i, _ ' >j >_ , 

iv* — -“Lorain* Ohio l'> ■ 

ru>^> , .v | f 8/23/73 ^ 1 , f< J — 

"1/ ROBERT. E. 3AR3&PME, ma ke the following L , — 

free *»nr t ^ rn1 nn^M-inr n -ha f. tamo - ™ ft to 

l an d f who nave identified - ; 

themselves to me as Special Age nts of the Federal 
Bureau of, Investigation . Agent ! I furnished me 

with an interrogation and advice of rights form 
which X read, understood and executed the waiver 
section, of this form,, be 

. b7C 

M X have been employed by American, Ship 
BUilding Company since 1965 to the present/. X 
was originally employed as manager of systems and 
procedures and since. 1968 X have held the position 
of corporate secretary. • . - - 

"At the: beginning 6f -my employment with 
American Ship Building my salary was somewhere' 
between f 13/000 ; 00 .and 4l4,6QQ..pp and my .current 
; salary is 42733QV0P. X have had 'gradual,, increases 
since 1968, the' latest increase whs January *24/ 

I973 when my salary - ' increased from $26,300,Q0 to 
427,506.00. T 

"In addition to my salary stated above, I - 

have also recleved bonuses since 1968 from 
American Ship Building Company averaging -about 
$5* 000.66 per year* 14y bonds in 1972 amdunted to - - 
.* 4‘B506.op \ 

"In connection with the bonus. X recleved in 
1972/X elected to take $5,000.00 fn 1972~ahd 
defer the. $2, 506.06 balance until January, 1973 
for tax purposes * 


Interviewed on„ 


ni Borain, Ohio 



Dale cfictaled_ 


r Cl eveland 56-83 


8/29/73 


IfiHlJocument contains neither cecommeodolipn.s npr conclusions of the FBI, It ts th«^>rppe<tyj$,f the FBI and Is loaned to your agency; 
it and Jjs contents ,offt not to be distributed optsldfe yoyr agency. * [ ^ 


7 X 





CV 56-83 


*!Any bonus which I recieve is less the city* 
state, and federal taxes. I am in the 38# tax 
bracket. - 

"in addition to salary and bonuses recieved 
frdm American Ship Building Company I also "Rave 
.stock options. Since 1965 X have exercised .my' 
stock optipn of 451 shares at $22.22 per share. 

X also hhve future stock option of 330 .shares at 
$11.62 per share and 1000 'shares at $23.50 per 
share, these, options tq expire in 1975 or- 1976. 

"In addition to the above salary bonus 
and stock option plans the only other fringe 
benefits X recieve ih. connection, with tty employ- 
ment are- two weeks vacation, per year .and a pension 
plan which Will give me $6.25 -per month per each 
years service. 

, n In 1972 X recall making the following 
political contributions: 

•’’In approximately 4 February 1972 X purchased 
two tickets, to the Senate majority dinner in 
Washington j B.C, *at $ij.0b0.00 per ticket. 

Neither- X' or tty" wife attended this dinner-. In 
c ohne ct ion with these tickets I was solicited 
through the mail by .ah individual whose identity 
I -cannot recall. I mailed the check for the 
tickets to the address furnished, me by, the 
solicitor. 

"Also in- February 1972 I was solicited through 
the mail to purchase a t ticket to the democratic 
'Campaign dinner in Washington*, by an, individual 
whom X presently recall may have been Senator HARRIS 
of Oklahoma., I purchased ,a ticket to this dinner 
and' forwarded my check to the Washington: address 
furnished, by the solicitor.' I also recall recieving 
a' telephone call by someone employed by Senator . 
HARRIS, possibly his Secretary,, to. determine if X 
was going to attend the dinner, which I did, not. 





CV 56-83 



”i wish to state that all of the contributions 
that I have made to political campaigns from 1=968 
thru 1972 were made from my personal checking account 
and that the money deposited in my checking account 
for this purpose would have been from my personal 
earnings either through, salary^ bonuses or frck deposits 
from my personal pavings account , 


34 





cy 56-83 

"I wish to state that in connection with any 
political, contributions X HaVe made there Have, 
been no promises or representations- made to iae to 
induce thebe contributions,, hor has any plan been ' 
made to me. by anyone for any direct or ’indirect 
reimbursement to“ me in the amount of the contribu- 
tions that I maded. X further state that X was 
nofr 'coerced' in any way by my employer to in any 
way participate' in any political campaign contribu- 
" tions i 


'•in connection with my personal financial 
status X .^ish to Slate that I- own, my residence,, 
outright and the. present value of this residence 
is approximately $35., 000. 00 i I also- began dealing 
in the stock market in 19653 and now have 
approximately $5Q*p60.OO to $60,000v6q in stocks and 
mutual funds:. The majority of my sto ck tranK- 
actiohs p ave been handled through Mrs .1 
, 1 of O.cala, Florida,. 

* 

"In connection with the banks 1 haye. personally 
dealt, with Since January 1, 1972 to the present 
time,. I wish, to, estate as follows ; 

u i Haver a checking and savings account at 
the Lorain Colanty Savings 'Trust Company in 
Amherst > Ohio,, the average, 'balance would -fluctuate 
between $2, 000 . 00 /to $4, 000 . 00 . X have, a savings 
account at. the Lorain National Bank on lit. 58, Lorain 
County, Ohio and, maintain an average balance of 
$300.00 to $500.00. I Have -a ^savings account at 
Citi2fehs Savings in. Amherst, Ohio 3 where I maintain 
a balance of $7,500,00 to $8,000;00. I also have 
a, safty deposit box at Citizens Savings ir\ Amherst > 
Ohio whih I have had for about /two years. : 

"In reference to. line -five of page four of 
this statement X would like to clarify the figure 
, eight or nine contributors and state that as many 
as fifteen, or twenty fellow employees may .haye 
discussed; making contributions at various times. 


be 

b7C 




cv 56-83 . * ' 

5 - . 

n I have, read this' .sitatenient consisting of 
this and si* other pages. I have initialed each 
page and each -correction. This statement is true 
and correct, to the best of my recollection* 

Vs/ ROBERT E. BARTLOME: 
8/23/73 


“Witnesses: 

‘ ^ * Vb6 




0 


' I 



\ 


cv 56-83 
6 



b3 

be 

b7C 


In connection with the granting, of bonuses by the 
American Ship Building Company, BARTLOME stated the stock 
holders had a meeting on January 24, 1973> and following 
this meeting was the meeting of the Board of Directors. He 
believes it was at this meeting that the authority was given 
to various corporate heads to give out bonuses during the 
year. He stated the final approval for any bonus would be 
given by Mr. GEORGE. M. STEINBRENNER, Chairman and Chi'ef *jJj 
Executive Officer of Ame rican Ship BuIlding ^Comoanv. and 
I IwfroVin TQ72 was Mr 

and who in 1973 is Mr. 


// 


5 


cne»ro±±ow±ng^xi.esc|r±pti^e‘ 
through observation and’ interview: 


Sptl^-dai^&ob^ihea^^ 


Sex ' 

Race 

Date of birth 

Place of hirth 

Height 

Weight 

Hair 

Eyes 

Scars 


male 
white 
11/7-/22 
Lorain, Ohio 
6 » 1 " 

195 lbs. 

black and graying 
brown 

cyst scar near tailbone 
gall bladder operation scar 


bo 

b7C 


I 


Marital status married 


Children 











• * 


cv 56-83 
.7 


'Education, 


graduated from Spencerian 
Business College 
Cleveland i Ohio 
19^1 - 


Social Security 
Number 

Residence 

Employment 

Occupation 


282-20t2715 

,27^ Sunrise Drive 
Amherst-, Ohio 
telephone - 984-8686 

^American Ship Building Company 
Lorain, Ohio 

Corporate secretary 


I 



/ 





FD-3Q^fR£V„ \l$7*7C>) 


FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 


Dote, of transcription 


Clevfel&nd> Ohio* was a dvASe 
Ing agent a aft Or 4fhlch.| 
infomatibn purs uant t H o a, Fedora 



Interviewed pn„ 


6/22/73 


Qieyelandj »fihio 


(Jleyeland *j>6-83 


.Date dictated^, 


8/22/73 


Ihlf document contains neither recommendations, nbr conclusions of the JFBt, t( Is the property of the f£* ond.^s loaned* to your ogency; 
Jt and its contend ore not to be" distributed outside your Ogency- , r " 

'■ ' ■ _ ' • ’ Aft ' ' ■ ' 





* 

£and* Ohio f-,u » Cleveland 5&-83 * 


. Data d feinted $ /82/ T 3 ' : 

df Ihe FBI r U Ts iKe properly, o( the 1 FBI and -Is loaned *jo w .your agency; 

i. 










f 0-302 ($EV, 1 , 1 . 21 - 70 ) 


FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 

* 


Polo of transcription.. 


8/29173 


was contacted at his pla ce of - 

employment,, the African Ship Building Company, 12th Flpor 
divestment Plaza, East. Ninth Street, Cleveland, Ohio* 

\ | in the presence of| 

| Amer ican .Ship Build ing Company, was ad vised Qf the 
identities o ff ~ and I l as Special, 

Agents of the Federal Bure au of Investigation (FBI) . • - . 

| |was advised by SA | of the nature of the 

investigation and orally advised of his rights and furnished 
ah Interrogation ; Advice; of Blights Form 11 ■which he read, 
stated he understood^ and voluntarily signed* 

| ‘V - H ; * 

Thereafter, in response' to. questioning, 
furnished his recollection, of ‘the facts epneerning a check, 
in the amount of $2,800, dated, April 7, 1 ^ 72 , drawn on hih 
checking account at Central Nat ionalr Bank,. Cleveland, Ohio, 

statement ^ras reduced to writing' and 
After having been read -the. prepared statement, sighed it, 

*hich statement reads as follows r - . 

~ - , - 

- . ‘’Clerolsnd > 5 $4? ’ 

, - August; 28, 1.973 : . 


themselves to me as -Spe 
Bureau of Investigation 


I furn ish the 
thry* statement tof 
jwho have -identif ied 
ial Agents of the, Federal . 
(FBI) , 1 have been fold 


Jnteryleyved on*, 



O.Qle^dicfoledi, 


, ^ Cleveland 56-83 


8/28/73 


This doeuwen) contoins^neilfier recommendation;; nor" conclusions^ df f Jhe FBI. H js Ihe property of the f.BI and Is loaned , jo your agency; 
: jl and, it* contents aH not fo^be dlslributed outside youl agency. ~ ~ . 


^ ’ 


tf tf 


- 





I 



t 


CV 56*! 83 

2 ■ - . 

that this investigation concerns apossible, 
Violatidh of Federal, laws concerning campaign „ 
contr ibut ions , specifically corporate campaign 
contr ibut ions , • ' . 

"I have been advised of my rights as set' 
forth on, an < Interrogation; Advice of Rights* 
fojrm. which % read and s igned in the, presence 
of the ab ove agents and‘| 

tor thi e- American Ship Building Company. _ 

I am presently 1 ' 

| of .American; 

Ship Building Company. I have been, associated 
- with- GEORGE- M. STE IN BRENNER ih. a business capacity 
•since 1966 while I was witii .Kinsman Marine. ^ Transit 
at which title X was earning about $10,000. I 
currently ’.earn $35,000 in salary per year , dim a 
house Valued at about $52,000, and own property 
in Canada with a value of about $100,000. I 
own about 138 .shares of stock in American, Ship 
Building, do.*., _ at .'about $20 per share, for Value 
of $2^500 « $3,00.0. I have a checkixig- account 
•with* Central, National Bank and. Onion. Commev c ® 

Bank- in 'Cleveland', ;0hio, and two checking accounts, 
with the Royal Bank of Canada in Bt. Catherine's, . 
Ontario, Canada. 


“Regarding a campaign .contribution made by, 
me to the campaign of RICHARD :NIX0N X recall that 
I made the contribution by personal check in an 
amount between $2,500 and, $3, 000 which was drawn 
on the Central National Bank, Cleveland, Ohio. 

The campaign contribution was motivate solely 
by-iny own desire to make a contribution to NIXON’s 
campaign and the fact that I was in a financial 
position to- make such a contribution. At the 
time 1 wrote the check I had been talking with. 


and ROBERT BARTLGME and other' 


company officers and employees about the 


b6 

b7C 


f 



'-'•’•a 


CV 56-83 

3 


campaign. I was not. aware of - how to go about 
making the contribution btit I was shown a, list 
6f s^eral. -committees, which I was told repres^d 
the Nixon campaign. , I do hot recall the s pecific 
chat X made t he check payable; to 


“My contribution was. hot solicited by any 
AMSHIP officer or by anyone else^and ^ 

told that I could expect any kind of jctobur^ent 
or any thing of any yalue at anytime immediate 

or deferred. , ! . 

- ^ ^ + if J 

"Around the same time that I wrote. the check, 
although 1 do not recall whether before cp after 
I received a company bonus, in the form of a check 

La^ on thi Sunt of .AMSHIP- m de out to me, Ihe 
fSS Tas l believe for $5,000 total and! Wgd 
have received a net -amount of about $2,800 which 
1 deposited in my checking account., ^ 1 know cf^no 
connection between the company .of £§rtog Even' 

at that time said my making the have 

if I had not received the bonus I still would have 

made a campaign contribution of some, amount* - * 

"I gave; my check to ROBERT' BARTLOME, Secretary^ 
of ; AMSHIP or: AIRSHIP Corp. > who told me,. he W° 
taSare^of it. t do not toow.That happed, to - 

the . check sifter that other than it was - cashed. 


b3 

b6 

b7C 








CV 56*83 
4 


"The only other campaign contribution I 
recall making was to U.S. Congressman WILLIAM 
MINSHALL.^hich was in 1972 for about $100.00. 


"The aboye account of .my recollection of 
the campaign contribution to the Nixon campaign 
is based solely on toy recollection of the facts 
and was not prompted or influenced' by any AMSHIP 
officials, and my contribution was solely my own 
desire .rather than any company project. 


"I, haye read the ;above statement consisting 
of this, and 2 other pages and state that the 
above statement is true to the best of toy knowledge. 

“,/s/ 1 ~ 

"Witness i 

, | | Special Agent, FBI, 

Cleveland, Ohio, .8-28-73.' 

~l Special Agent, FBI, b6 
Cleveland, 8-28*73." b7 


At his request, | fwas furnished 

photo static copy .of the. above three-page statement. 


In addition to the above information, ! ~ 

stated that he does not recall specific amounts, of various 
financial transaction checks written or other monies 
personally expended by himself" as he claimed that he is 
in a position to make relatively large expenditures because 
of his comfortable f inahcial situation. 


As ah example, he noted that he also received a , 
bonus during this year, 1973, possibly in. the amount of 









e 


CV 56-83 

5 


$5. bOO hut does hot recall the npnth or exact season that 
he received the bonus. He noted that GEORGE SXEINBRENHER 
is the type of boss idio may make a casual statement to the 
effect that an employee willreceive a bonus or a raise 
and sometime, thereafter', perhaps several months,, he tyill 
receive £ame. » 


-He stated he has ho information concerning any 
other bonuses that any other officers may have received 
and noted that the bonus that he received 'around the. 
time that he. made the Contribution to the Nixon, Campaign 
was the bonus he had been .expecting from the company 
since his -discussion with GEORGE SIETNBRENNER some time' 
in' November or .December, l?7‘i» 

Inoted that the receipt, of the; bonus 
■and his - making the $2,800 campaign contribution are 
■merely coincidental 'as far as. both occurring 'at the ^ 
same time, and he stated that even, if he had- not received 
the bonus, he. wdtftd still have made a contribution to 
the Nixon Campaign as he thought the Nixon Administration 
bett'er' represented the. interest of the American Ship, 
Building Company than did the administration of GEORGE 
MG GOVERN, ' ' - , 


In response to questioning, [ 


stated 


that his reCbliectidn, of the- -citcumstances- .surrounding 
the .campaign, contribution are,, true and accurate to the 
.best Of his knowledge and- that he would -not hesitate to 
relate the; same account before $nV judicial Proceedings/ 
of any grand jury. 


The following description was -obtaanec xnrougn 
interview and observation: 


Name: 

;Sex: 

Race: 


b6 

b7C 




~iiale' » T , } 

- t f 







0 

*4 - 


CV 56-83 

A 

Pate of birth: - 
Place of birth: 
Height: 

Height: 

Hair: 

£*yes: 

Social Security 
Account Number 
Citizenship: 

Address: 

Home telephone* 

Education: 

Relatives: 



Previous. 

employment,:- 





fD-302 (REV. 1 1-27-70! 

» • 


l 



FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 




Dole 6( transcription 


8/29/73 


GORDON STAFFORD, age 55, 20328 Parfclone Drive, 

Rocky Rivdr,. Qnio, was"caats'cted at Ills, piece of ex^loyaant,. ’ 
the Acer ican Ship Euilding Company, 12th Floor,’ Invcctjaent 
Plaza, East ITihth Street, Cleveland, Ohio. 


STAFFORD was adv ised of the identities of ^ 
]and l l as Special Agents, of the Fe deral 


Bureau- of Investigation (FBI) and van inf orned by SA[_ 
of the, natu re of the invest lari t ion. STAFF ORD., in the 


presence of | for the /-ceric ah 

Ship Buildin n Conponv. was orally advised of his tights 
t>y S/| Hasr set forth oh. on ^’interrogation; Advice of 
Eights Fota M which he read, stated that he understood and 
signed. 


bo 

b7C 


ihereaf tet, STAFFORD, who* stated, he is. Vice President ‘ 
of Sales of American Ship Building Conpany, furnished the ' 
following signed statement: ^ , 

. Cleveland, Chid . 

. - ' August 28, 1973. 


; t»I, GCffiDOti STAFFORD., age. 55, 20320 Parklcne 
Dr. , Rocky Fiver, Ohio* desire to furhish the 
following free and voluntary stateoent to, 

[ and I |who have identif ied , 

to isa as Special Agents Of the Federal 
Bureau of investigation. I have been fold that 
this investigation: .concerns a possible violation 
of Federal laws concerning campaign contr ibut ions , 
specifically Corporate eanpaign contributions. * 

’’I have, been adviced of sy rights as set 
forth oii an ^Interrogation; Advice of Rights* 


4* 


Interviewed *on_ 8/08/73 0 i Cleveland f Ohio 


SA[ 

and 

bo 

. hlC ' 


. SA 

mi*, hap 

t)ote dictated, 


Fii e ^Cleveland 56-83 


. 8/28/73 


this document contains neither recommendation*. conclusions *b| the Fty. 
H ahd its Contents are not Ip be distributed putsTde your agency* . - 

' ' > 


It Is the property'ot the f8l tjanrf looned to yoQf ogency^ 


v«* 

JF 









£ 


CV 56-83 

2 


form which 1 read an d signed In the- presence of 
the above agents and l 

.for the American Ship Building Company. 


”1 have been employed, by the American Ship 
Building Company since 1937. I' became manager of 
the Lorain, Ohio yard around 1954 and then was made, 
an assistant to the Vice President of Sales ,for 
American Ship Building Company and earn $30,000 
,per year. T own a $50,000 home which has about a 
remaining $2,000 mortgage. In addition X receive 
about $4,000 yearly through a deferred profit, shafiiig 
plan and. also receive director’s fees for a total 
yearly income of about $41,000. I have about 
$40,000 savings in cash and certificates of deposit 
ih Westside Federal Sayings and Loan, Fairview 
Park, Ohio, in addition I have about $28,000 ih 

nnd bonds . I hav e a joint checking account 


with 


t 


with the Cleveland Trust 


Company, Cleveland, unib . 


.bo 

■b7C 


b6 

b7C 


’’Regarding my campaign contribution to the 
Richard Nixon campaign in April, 1972, I recall 
the contribution was' made ih the form of a check 
jn the. amount of $2,900.00 drawn on my and my 
fife’s checking account. Around the same time, 
either before or after, I received a company bonus 
representing a gross amount of $5,000,. pf which 
I received $2,900 net amount in the form of an 
^AMSHIP payroll check. The difference between the 
two amounts represents the deductions front, the 
gross amount. 

”At the time I actually made the* contribution 
I happened to be at. the Lprain, Chio, offices of 
AMSHIP. ROBERT BARTLGME, Secretary of AMSHIP had 



0 




* > 




CY 56-83 

3 


a list of several, committees or groups representing 
the Nixon Campaign and I wrote the $2,900 check 
out to one of the committees listed. I handed^ 
the check to BARTLOME who 1 understand was going 
to have someone, possibly l | another 

-company official, hand deliver the check to 
Washington,, D.C.. 


b6 

b7C 


“The contribution was solely my idea and 
represented 'my own personal funds and not AMSHIP 
money and no company official or employee solicited*- 
the contribution. 1 did not expect or receive,- 
any consideration or anything of value, either 
’immediate or deferred, for 1 the contribution- given. 

The contribution Was motivated by my desire ho 
support the Nixort Campaign and my financially- 
being able to do so. The fact that the bonus and 
the contribution were identical in amount is mainly 
a matter of timing and one was not. directly inf luenced 
by the other . 

“In addition 1 also had made, previous campaign 
contributions one of which was a 51,000 check to 
a. Democratic dinner and another was in the amount 
of $1,900, possibly to a Republican Senate Dinner. 

I later made a $100 check contribution to the 
Nixon campaign. - At the time X made the $2,900 
check contribution 1 was aware of the impending 
deadline of the contribution laws which would 
make public the amounts of contributions, and donors.' < 


"In summary there was no company plan or 
inducement to make specific campaign contributions 
and the above, account regarding ny contribution 
is my own and not prompted or suggested by' any 
AMSHIP official or any other person. 





CV 56-83 

4 


"I have read the above statement consisting 
of this page arid two (2) other pages and state 
that it is the truth as I. know it.. 


%sl GORDON STAFFORD 


'‘Witness;: 


Special' Agent, FBI, 

Cleveland, Ohio*, 8-28-73, 


| Special Agent, RBI, 
Cleveland, Ohio, 8-28-73 J* 


Upon, reading.'and signing the above statement, 
STAFFORD requested a photostatic cppy of same and jreis 
furnished a cop/. , 


b6 

b7C 


In addition to the above, STAFFORD was specifically 
questioned concerning the disbursement Of company' bonuses 
particularly when thpse bonuses might amount tp a. gross of 
9.5,000 among six or more officers. STAFFORD, who stated 
he is a member of the, Board of Directors pf American Ship 
Building Gompany, advised that the disbursement of funds 
for bonuses is usually the subject of Bo'ard discussions 
■and normally minutes or written records would be retained 
for same. STAFFORD was questioned as to whether he could 
recall any Board meetings which may have been convened 
prior to April j 1972, and also if there was such, a meeting, 
whether pr not they might have had a discussion concerning 
company bonuses . STAFFORD stated Tie could not recall 
whether ’or ’not such a board .meeting -might have occurred 
and/or whether such a discuss.ipn might have taken place 
pr been- recorded. 

At the conclusion pf relating his recollections 
of the circumstances regarding the $2,900! campaign.' 






0 


CV 56-83 


- 

contribution to the Nixon campaign* STAFFORD was asked 
whether he- felt that he could, relate the same account . 
before any judicial proceedings or grand jury with, the 
full, 'confidence that same would be the truth Whereupon 
he replied thSt he felt that he could jts his responses 
j-rerd based; hpbh the truth to the best of his recollection. 

The following descriptive data Was 5 obtained 
- through interview and observation: 

- _ ' Name: ” 

Sex: 

Racet 

Date of birth: 

Place of^birthr 
Height: ' 

Height: 

Hair: 

Dyes: 

Soc ial Security., 

- - Account Ntnabey : 

Address: 


be 

b7C 



GORDlSikSTAEFORD 
‘ Mali A 
White 

jJanuary^^^^, 
’"Clevel^d, Ohio** 

190 lbs. 

Black 

. Grayish green* wears 
271-01-7 624 


•Home telephone: 
Education: 
Relatives t 


Eriployn^nt? 


Rooky River , Ohio 

~33I =35IT * 


Hieh school graduate 



American Ship Building Company 
1937 to date;' - 



FO-3J2 (REV. 1 1-27-70) 


FEDERAL BUREAU OF. INVESTIGATION 


Doto of Ironscrlplion. 


tactea ao nxs place o 
identities of 
Special Agent sTTS 



10 * "was con 
e 


bureau of Investigation 


was exhibited and served with a subpoena 



subpoena is issued, by the Honorable JOHN JT., SIRICA, 
United States District Court for- the District of Columbia 
and dated A%ust iO, 1973^. - 

. Specifically the Sdbpoena 



| Jwas adyised by SA | I that: the offidd 

of ; the special jprb^e'dutp’r will Cons ider that; the subpoeha 
has been appropriately answered I 



Upon a review’ of the subboeria 
that it Is possible: that! 



Interviewed, on 


.Date dictated. 


document fonlqlns neither recommendations, nor conclusions otthe F8f. Jt Is the property of the fBFond is loaned to. your agency; 
it and its contents are not to be- distributed outsfde your agency—*. t 












CV 56-83 

2 


stated he would 




b 
b 

b7C 


f 



G'\ Co 









!&$, document. contains neither ^recommendations nor conclusion* of the- FBI* It ^ the property of the T8I and Is loaned to* your agency; 
ft pnd its contents ore 'not to be distributed, outside your agency. 



•3 02' (REV. 1 1-27-70)- 



> 0 

FEDERAL bureau of investigation 



~ Dale of IfonKflpllon - 8**3Q ~73 ^ 

X ' ' 

k Mr. ROBERT EXONS: DIBBLE was interviewed at. his 

ampibyrnent, American; Ship Building Company* Ibrain, Ohio, 
this .dat e* at which time he furnished the following 
signed 'statement: 

"l, ROBERT LXONS DIBBLE, m ake the foliowing 
free and voluntary statement to I I 

|— | .and | | who hat® Identified . 

themselves, to me. as special, agents of the ^Federal ' be 
Bureau of lnvpstlgatioh., have been furnished an b7c 
j inte rrogation: advice of. rights form by special 
agen tl I X have read and understand the 

meaning of this form and haye executed, the 
waiyer section of the form*. 


"I am 58 years of age ahd reside in’ "Westlake, 
Ohio*, immediately prior - to - my 1 ‘taking employment 
with the American Ship 'Building ’Company in. f 

_ October of 1967' i was employed for 21 years as. 

.an agent .for Northwestern Mutual fife Insurance, 
-Company* I am presently the yice-iresident of 
personal at .American Ship Duilding' Company and 
held prior positions in both public relatione 
and .employee relations. My beginning salary 
with .American .Ship .Building Company in October 
of 1967 was $12,000*00 and my current- salary' 
is, $17,300.00., I- recently f eeieyed a false in. 
August, 1973, "which- raised iny salary frbm 
$16,300.00. to ? $17 * 300 * 00. i; 

* "During, the years I967 thru- 1969 3: .do, not 

recall fecieving any bonuses from my currant 
Employer. “TTufing the years of !970, 1971 and 
; 1972 1 recall repieying $5-,p00,p6. bonus per year. 

/- - - ~ i 

’ ? I ^ish to. state that? it 'd&M t recall . 
exactly’ when' - the, 'Various bonuses were -paid, .as 
there is no set date when bonuses :are given 
but nor do I recall the specific: feaspn. for ,iay*. 

. bonuses but believe they would have been paid - - 


interviewed oYi_ 


-8-29-73 c. Lorain v 6hio ’ 


M. 


siu 


and ~ b6 

hie 


..Date dictated, 


uplift * Cleveland -56,-83 

— £ - -- 

8-29-73 


A?B‘:rep 


llhts document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions 0 / the FBI, it it the s prope<ty of Jhe_ FBI and is loaned to youe ogencyf 
if' and Its contend are not Jo be disljibufed,ouTside your agency. . * ■ ‘ - w 



T 






Q O 

a- ^ 


cv 56-83 

2 

for some type of outstanding service rendered. 

I also wish to state that I have no personel 
knowledge as to how employees are selected - for 
_ , the re ciep t of these bonuses,. 

"In regards bo any istock options that 
, have been made available^ to, me, at American 
Ship Building Compahy', I can riot recall what 
optioris have been offered but: I do believe. I 
I .have’ a current option to purchase 224 shares 
bht do no.t recall the. price of these shares 
.at option. X further Wish, to state that X 
ha y ve never engaged in buying or selling stocks. 

"Other than the salary' and bonuses X 
recieve fronx any, present employer I also recieve* 
annually renewals from insurance policies I. 
previous^ wrote . These- renewals .are- paid for. 
a period - of* 9 years.. In. the year of 1972 I, .. 

- recieyed approximately $1,100.00 from renewals.. 
I also Wi&hbto state that I have, no other, 
investments., q#ri no real estate, and my wife is 
* hot .employed. 

"In regards '..to my\perso'nel business i. 
maintain a, .chebfeihg’ account with an average 
balance of $600:. 00 to $700.00 at the Society. 
National Bank, Main Office, Cleveland, Ohio.-, 

I also have a savings account . with, a balance 
of about. $8,000.00 at, the Society National, 

Ba'nki Kamms Branch, Cleveland, Ohio., 1 do- 
not .rent any safty deposit box in any bank. 

"During* the years- -of 1967 thru. 1969 X . 
c an- no t recall -raking any ^petary political 
contributions, nor can i recall making any 
such contributions prior to 1967. 

"In 1970 I recall making the following 
political contributions. I gave $500.00- to 
the personel campaign of Cpngressrah. CHARLES 
MOSHER, rmade this contribution with a 
personel check and probably mailed, this, check 
to MOSHER’s campaign committee. I do. not 
recall being solicited for this,, contribution 






' CV $6-83. 

3 

and wanted to make this contribution persohelly 
because I. had known of CHARLES MOSHER for a~ 
number of years ana considered him to be a good 
man. I knew i<h.e competition he had was keen 4 
and I wanted to giye him what assistance X 
could. 

”! also contributed 'two checks of $ 506 . 00 ' 
each . to the Ohio; State Republican "Finance 
Committee* % believe X was solicited in some 
manner through the mail, by this committee, arid 
the .Checks would have been sent at different 
times. 

n I contributed about $l*4d0.00 to the - 
National Democratic Party Dinner Committee 
in Washington j ’^C!; X believe the actual price 
pit the dinner was $5.OO*0Q per plate even* though 
.1 gave $XV 4 c>"P*' 06 *'- in connection with this - 
dinner I was npt solicited- in arty way but 
wanted -to-. -Contribute. I attended this dinner, 
and 1 b.elleye it. was the year'" that GEORGE M. 
STEINBRENNERj Chairman and Chief Executive 
Off icer of American -Ship, Building Company*. Was 
chairman, of the -dinner.. X believe that I 
either mailed ^ check to the, dinner , committee 
or pessibly gaye- the ;chet*fc pejt?s6%liy to the 
dinner committee at 'the May flower Hotel in 
Washington*. DVC*. * 

"During 1971 I. made no political 
contributions 

"I made the -following political contributions 
luring the year 1972. * I purchased two - tickets 'to 
the National De'mocratic7Cengressib.nal, Di^peb* 
date uhrecalled* and believe the tickets were 
$$00,1)0 each*; X may have been, solicited thru 
the mail for this dinner -and believe I probably 
mailed the check for the tickets to the cbmmlttea 
;eVen though.! per aohaily attended the dinner. 

,! X contributed to the Republican dinner 
which. X believe was called the Seriate Bouse 
Majority Dinner Tickets to this dinner were 5 
$1*000*00,. each and X purchased two tickets. 




CT 56r83 - 

4 


In connection, with toils dinner" X believe I was * 
solicited, through, the mail arid would have 
returned my check by mail. X did- hot attend 
this, dinner. 

"X also contributed to an ^organization 
formed to, assist in. the re-election of 
. president NIXON> I beiieve this organization, 
was called* the ’Loyal Americans for' Government 
Reform i * I contributed $3*000,00 to this 
organization; and believe the contribution^ was 
made by a personal check in early April 1972. 

"in connection with the above’ contribution 
to =• the: -NIXON re-election campaign* X was* very 
concerned' and wanted to help . NIKON defeat MC GOVERN 
as I felt MC GOVERN would not be a gbod. president. 
From time 1 to time various emplbyees -would talk; 
about the Presidential campaign in general 
conversation around the office and I think I 
asked- BOB BARTLOME where, would be the best 
place ;to serid money to jieip re-elect NIXON.. 

I am not positive but* X think BOB BARTLOME. may 
have given me the name of Loyal. Americans' lor 
Government Reform td-which committee X made 
out d.check "fpr- $3*006*00^ X don’t recall if 
-X mailed the check\to' the Committee .or if I 
gave it to someone to’ deliver for toe. arid if X 
gave It to- :anyorie it, would, .have been BOB BARTIOMEV 


“in. ifphonetic) 

who works. /in DAN: INQIKEL’s office in wapnington* D.C. 
in th e Cleveland, Ohio^ area. X had previously met 
| |at brie of the~ ^emocrat ic ..dinners: ;I attended; 
in Washinfet6n> : iric^ (mentioned that they . 

were going to have a .dinner for DAN INOUYE and 
I told him that because of my interest .in DAN ’ 
and the ability which .he possesies X wanted, to 
.make a contribution of $250.OO‘~Trb the success of " 
this dinner* I gave the check to| |. 


be 

blC 


b3 

b6 

b7C 



0 O 


CV: 56-83. 
§' 



"X wish to state that even though the 
information furnishes above reflects that prior 
to 1970 X had not' made any political contributions 
and subsequent, to 1969 I have made considerable 
political contributions in. t^e yeiar ; 197,0 and 1972 i 
the nature of my employment or the reciept bf 
bonuses, from my employer had. no: direct.bearing on 
^ decision to make contributions v’ X further 
state that -I have not been requested, or eompllled * . 
to make : any political contribution by a^bne.^hor 
have any promises; of r e. imbur s'^ment in any form, 
been promised to me by anyone. . 

•’’In connection with the $3, pop. 00 
contribution made to. the; loyal .Americas: for 
Gov'erhment Reform i believe I" would, iiaye made 
some monetary, contrlbutioii fegaf&iess of whether 
or not I recieved a bonds* but * the. 'amount ‘ of the 
bonus had. anTjafluence on the amount of money X, 
was able to contribute. In connection with the 
other contributions mentioned, above X dp not 
believe they were- influenced .in any way by any 
bonus X recieved. 

”To the 'best, of my recollection i do, ,'not. 
believe that I ever withdrew any .money from my 
savings account to ••deposit in my cheeking, .account 
to coyer checks written for ’political contributions. 
X also state that any polit leal contributions,! 

•have made haye been written on- my per sohai Checking 
account. ‘ ‘ ' 

”1 have read this statement coiisistlng of 
this page and eight (8) other piages.. I have 




V 


Q 



GV 56-83 

jS. . 

Initialed .each page and each correction. This 
statement is true and correct to the best of my 
recollections 


”/s/ ROBERT XYONS DIBBLE 
8-29-73 


Witnesses: 


SAi FBI, Elyria, Ohio, 8-29-73 
_3A, FBI, Elyria,- Ohio'* 8-29-73.” 


The/following descriptive data was obtained from. 
ROBERT LY0NpV3}IBBLE. during interview: 

1 1 ■r— '-V' 1 * - ^ 

Sex 
Race 

- Date of Birth 


b6 

-b7C 


Place of Birth" 


Weight 
'Weight 
;Halr 
Eyes. 

Marital Status 
Son 

Daughter 
Social Security No.* 


M&le 

White 

Jan uary 8. 1015 
ZToledoJ^Ohio . 
5*10" 

200 lb s » 

Gray 
Blue 



Home, Telephone 

Employer 

Occupation 


. 294 - 07 - 46 ^ 9 - _ 
27843 Detroit Road 


W^tiakeTDhib 
'871=4670 “^ 

American Ship- Building. Company 
Vice President in Charge ' 
of personnel ' , 


i 



1 * 


FD-3.02.pEV. l I-27-70J- 


FEDERAL* BUREAU OF INVESTiGATION* 


Dale ol transcription. 


8/29/73 


. , Mr. I -was interviewed at- 

his. employment .'American Ship building Company,, Lorain, Ohio, 
at which time he furnished the following signed statement: 

"horain,. Ohio 

8/28/73 

. I ~l make the follow- 

H ing fre fflnri vmunr.fl-rv- .qf.fl^ pmpn-h 

I fe nd I , I who, have aaentiriea , t.hera^ . * 

■*■ selves, to me as special agents' o f the ^F ederal Bureau 
of Investigation. * Special: Agent | [has- orally* - - 

advised ; me -that X do not have tomaKe any statement . 
and that any statement I do make could be. uSed against' 1 
me in a cdurt of law. X have further" been advised 
that I have the right; to consult with, an attorney , 
prior to\beihg interviewed and also* have the right ' ; b c 
jto.be represented hy an attorney during this', inter- 
*; - view if X so chose*. X hlsjb: have been advised that * y 
' . . X dd hOt-haye to answer 4 aii questions X do* not 
desire to :and that X haye a right to terminate' the" 
interview, it anytime X desire, to do ;so. X wish .to ‘ 
state that, ho treats or- .promises were made to be 
by* thh .above identified agents tp*. induce my cddpefatioh. 


iSbilpwing* my graduation from 

jX - spent mpst of My Subsequent years from 
1905 thru 1970 ih the •feachhag profession in both 
the, Cleveland,- Ohio and* wbfth OLasted, Ohio. School 
districts-., ' : ‘ ' 

,f 0h June. 8, 1970, X began employment with 
.American Ship Building Company in the ca pacity of 


> , beginning ;salafy b with jMteficah Shih - 

Building 'Company paM $12,000.00 per year*- Ih 
approximately jDecember .of 1971 my salary was raised 
to $15,000.00, Where it. fSMaihed uhtil /August, of 
1973 When it was again increased to $16,000^06. 


-Interviewed .on 8/28/73 


Lorain j> Ohio 


.Cleveland 58-83 



> dicloled 8/29/73* 


Jhis document contotns neither ^cojhmendojfons nor ^ohclusfdns offjhe.FBIj It h .tt\e property of the fBJ and tt loaned Jto youc ogency; 
]t ohd„ its; contents ore. not. to he distributed putside^your, agency. *■ 



"During the years 1970' and. 1971 1; recieved' 
no dther compensation from my employer, ln“l97.2j v . 
sometime in April, of this year,, I recieved a $5,000.00 . 
bonus. To date iri 1973. X have recieve? no bonus. 

"The net amount of the bonus 1, recieved in 1972 
after' taxes and other deductions -were taKen out 
amounted to $ 3 , 650 ; 00 . 

"During approximately February i972 I. engaged 
in conversation with several fellow employees at 
American Ship Building Company concerning, the 
presidential election.' Two of the individuals I 
recall speaking with in this regard were Mr., ROBERT. 
BARTLOME and Mr. DANIEL KISSEL. We discussed the 
Various, merits of the NIXON’ Administration in. 
connection with the maritime industry which was 
greatly bolstered by the passage of the. Maritime 
Act of 1970. * This added great security to many 
jobs due to the construction, of new ships, In 
addition, to this facet of the NIXON administration 
-I was also interested in the manner- in which President 
NIXON handled, other various problems which confronted: 
•the nation. 

"In connection with these conversations mentioned 
above concerning the re-election of President NIXON 
I asked Mr . BARTLOME how an individual, could make a, 
contribution toward the re-election of President 
NIXON;, Mr. .BARTLOME stated that he would find out. 

"Mr. BARTLOME subsequently advised me. that he 
had obtained the name of a committee X could direct . 
my contribution to from Mr..> GEORGE Mi STEINBRENNER,. 
Chairman and Chief Executie Officer of American. Ship 
Building Company, Mr. BARTLOME later gave me the 
name of a committee I believe was called 1 Supporters 
of Good Government". 



O o 

t 


CV 56r83 

3 ' 


Jf 0n April 6, 1972 1 wrote a persdnel. check -on 
my account at' Cleveland Trust Bank, Cleveland, Ohio 
to the -Supporters, .of Good Government in the amount of 
,|3^QO.opi ' , : * - ' 

"Prior to; writing the; above check I had learned: 
from Mr. BABTLOME , possibly as far hack as February 
19723 . that' I was" going to recieve a .$5000.00 borius^ 
from the American Ship Building Company. asAs. X recall 

the’ date I . reefeyed the bonus %nd the datb of my 

contribution to the above. c6iiim.itt.ee were very closet 

, "I wish to s trite that X made; the contribution, 
tq the above committee of my own free will .and was 
not compelled to do so in any way by my emplbyment. 

1; further wish $0 state, that. X.?ieit so -strongly 
about the necessity .of reTeiec.ting^ President NIXON - 
that I would have made borne type of itforietary eontri^' 
b'utibh- even though ±. .hAd'hot'^etcieved! avbojnris* how-, 
ever the bonus made it popsible'l'or -me' to- hake- the 
contribution* JE made above,. .After X had, made ou,t the 
check to the Supporter's of Good .Government, X. gaye 
the, check to .Mf>.-.EARTLOME who told he- he’ would *”/' 
behd 'the check .along with his. contyibutioh arid that . 4 
of DANIEIi; ;KISSEi(, X have iio idea hori the: check . 
was delivered to ’the committee fbr -Supporters, of 
. Gopd; Government. ~ . - 

- "No provisions, or promises were made to. -me 
.by my employer or anyone .else indicating X, ' 
would be reimbursed, in any way' for any pplitical ' . 
cbhtributions I made. I- “further btat.e that X 
, have .not: made any'- previous, political,, boptributiohs 1 
* and .made ho bthef political' coritr ibutio'rih thru the; 

year 1972 . ' : ; ; : 'K - v . 

"Concerning my personel banking accounts X 
have my* .savings and checking Account at the Cleveland 
Trust Bank, my home mortgage at. the SecordPederal 
Badrigs arid loan arid 1 haye a .automobile' loan at the. 
National 'City Bank of .Cleye£and ? "bhio • X do riot 



CV 56-83 

& 


i 


!/ 





have a safty deposit ho,x at. any hank. I have read 
this statement ., I. have initialed each page and each 
correction. This statement consists of (5) five 
pages and one other page to -which X'will .sign, my 
signature. This .statement AS true and correct to 
the best of my recollectioni 


'7a/[ 


8/28/73 


sWitneSs’es i 

/b A 

/*/ 


SA, FBI, Elyria, Ohio 8/28/73; 
HFBI, Elyria, Ohio 8/28/73? 


f 


? 

i 


In, addition to the information furnished above, 

Mr. I ~1 advised that in July . 1973,, he made #$200 

contribution for linner with Ian which he stated was a dinner 
in honbr of IAN .XNOTJYE "Which contribution he paid for with 
a personal check/ 


The following descriptive data w^s obtained during 
tie interview: 


Tlame 

Sex 

Race 

Dkte of^ Bi rth 

Elace of .B irth 

Height 

Weights 

Hair 

Eyes 

Wife 

Children 


Residence 
/Social Security 


Male 

White 


' North Olmsted], OhiO”~ 
"^5’^ii” — w- — — 

,23d 

Blond 

Urnvm 



hor un uims.-bea.„o 
IPhnnoil 


b6 

b7C 




cv 56-83 

5 


Education 

Bnplcjment 

Occupation. 


American Ship Building Company 





FO-302 (REV. 1.1-27-70), 


FEDERAL BUREAU Of INVESTIGATION 


8/29/73 

Dole of Irnntrrtplion 1 . 


BAhIEL_ AUGUST KISSEL, 37849 Lake Drive, Avon, Ohio, 
waS contacted*^ (,"lUe Offices of "the AmericanShip Building b6 

Company, Investment Plaza,, East 9th Street, Cleveland, Ohio* b 7c 

- - * ■¥ 

KTSsiar, wa s advised of the identities, of I 
and I I as Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of 

Investigation. (FBl Y and V ?as informed of the nature of -the 
investigation by SA | l - . ~ 

J' W ' _ , 

After, haying been orally- advised of his rights, and 
executing a ^faiVer of his fights ah set forth 5n 'an "Interrogation! 
Advice of Bights, Form” KISSEL, was informed that i n connection - 
with the investigation a subpoena. had Been served I ~l , 



Thereafter j KISSEL furnished the following sighed 
Statement: ’ ” . - - 

^Cleveland, Ohio 

, a • • ■ . ^ .August 29 ,; 1973 *•" 

"I, -DAhIEL. ATJGCST KISSEL, cage do, 37849 Lake 
Drive, .Avon,. Ohio, hereby in ake the followin g f ree 
ana volunt ary statement to, |and| | 

Iwho have identified themselves no me. as 
Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 

•”l have been furnished a form entitled, "Inter- 
rogation: Advice of Bighth" with a waiver .of rights 
th ereon. I have signed this wdiver in the presenpe . 
of 1 | for American 

•Ship. Building, Company. ’ 


Interviewed on_ 


Cleveland. Ohio 



Dole dictated. 


Cleveland, 56-83 


8/29/73 


fhis document contains neijher* recommendations nor conclusions ol the* FBI, Il ls the property of the FBl/andMs loaned to yoon agency; 
Jt qnd its, contents a/e not to Jbe disputed- outside 1 your agency. 


f 





* 




CSV 56-83 

2' 


n I have also, been, advised this investigation 
concerns campaign contributions as. they might 
relate to, a possible violationi of Federal election * 
laws, particularly the contributing, of corporate 
funds or. monies through, company employees or .officers. 


"I have. teen employed by the Kinsman Marine 
Transit Co*, a* subsidiary of the. American Shipbuilding 
Company since 1963 * Since about 1967 X, have been 
Treasurer of Kinsman Marine Transit and earn $14,500 
yearly . X. own a $30,000 home which has' a bout a 
$1,400 mortgage remaining*, I and my wife l I 

have, a joint checking account at the Lorain, Ohio, 
branch of Cleveland Trust Company , which 1 has ah 
average monthly balance; of $30.0*00.; In addition/ 

.my wife arid X each have Savings accounts at the 
downtown branch, of the Union; Savings arid Loan 
Associa tion with total, balance of about $5/000. 

My wife | [also has about a $1,000 savings 

account a.r. wranrivipw Savings; also' at downtown 
Cleveland, Ohio.* also has a $2,000 

to $2,500. savings account at -cne Avon, Ohio branch. 1 
:of the Central Seeurlty National Bank of Lorain,. 4 
Ohio*. - - 


■b6 

b7C 




"Regarding the $3,50O contribution to the RpCON 
.campaign.-, which X recall making, early in April,, 1972, - 
1 can state that this contribution came about 
after discussion with my wile and other employees of 
the American Ship Building Company on Kinsman Marine 
Transit, My wife arid X feit that we wished, to make 
a substantial contribution to th;e RICHARD NIXON 
campaign as, 1 in our ppinioh, his policies better 
represented out interests than did the Democratic, 
candidate GEORGE MC GOVERN. ' 

"At the time I made -the. contribution I had 
been working out at the Lorain,. 0h5o, American Ship- 
building Co., ahd ROBERT BARTLOME had a list of ‘ 
several, committees which I Understand were bapkihg 
the NIXON campaign. . I wrote a $3/500 check to one. 
of the committees, the .specific -hame X do not recall, 
and gave my check to. ROBERT BARTLOME,. who I under- 


I 









cv 56-83 

•z 


stand gave the, check to 


an .American Ship 


Building company official, "who took the check to’ 
Washington, D.C. 


b6 

b7C 


' I was a>ware at the time that there was a 
deadlirie coming lip which, in . effect*. Would make 
campaign donars and contributions public infor- 
mation;! intended to cover the §3,500 charge to ,iny 
checking account by the transfer ‘bf personal savings 
accounts funds. However," it. so happened at that 
time that : I received a §5*000 company bonus in the 
form of an American Ship BuildihgOompany payroll 
check in the amountoof §3,750, which represented, the 
$5,000 bonus less, the usual 'deductions/ 


-"I- had been expecting' the .bonus -but ± was not 
sure when Xi^ould receive the check on what the 
'amount was going to be. Regardless of the receipt 
of the bonus I still, would, have mkde "a contribution 
t6 the NIXON campaign! Prior to receiving the- 
$5 *000 bonus the highest or largest company 
bohus I had received Was $ 1 , 200 .* Since the April 
1972 bonus; X received, a $1*500 compahy bonus in . 
February or March of this year, 1973. X am not 
familiar with- the corporate procedure for; the 
allocating, of company bonuses and . I can only account 
for the sizeable bbnus which .1 received in, 1972.by 
citing the financial succeS's of the company in 1971. 
Also my campaign contribution, including thCagtount 
.was my bwn idea and in no. Way was. .my making the $3,5Q0 
contribution motivated by my anticipated bonus or any 
instruction, order* or specific encouragement by 
my employer GEORGEMV S233INBRENNER or any other 
company' officer or employ ee. Also, ho, representative 
or suggestion was made* t.o me about- any reimbursement^ 
direct, or indirect, immediate or deferred, or any 
repayment or any consideration or anything of value 
for my making the contribution. 

'• Other than the above-mentioned contribution 
I, have never made any campaign .contributions* to _ 
either party at this time . 




o 


CV 56-83 


"I have read the above statement consisting 
of this page and two other pages and certify that 
the statement is true to the best of my knowledge* 

*S ' " ! ' w 


“Witness 1 


’M 


i 

) 


/s/ DANIEL.^^KISSEL 


Special Agent, Cleveland, Ohio . 

Special Agent, FBI, Cleveland, Ohio 8/29/73 i c " 




KISSEL requested a copy of the above statement anc 
was fCirnished with same. 


interviews. 


Following, is descriptive data obtained during 


"Name 
Sex 
Face 
Date_J>f-Bi-rth- 


Place of Birth 

Height 

Weight, 

Hair 

Eyes 

Social, Secjyirity^ 

Education 

Military 


Hpme addreri^ 


Wife 

Son 

Son 



DANIEL AUGUS! 
■MaleT — 

White 

-Iuly-21^.1913- 


Oieveland.-Ohlo- 

5 r 10 ,f 

I92 

Brown and gray. 

Blue*, glasses 

_# 271 =. 03 ^ 39.71 , • 

1-f years college 
.US Army 

: 1943-46 and 1950^52 
Honorable Discharge 
J^849 J^e^£iK6* - 
Avon. Ohio 

’ffeaeT" 3g*P44o7 


87 



FD-302 (REV..1 1-27-70)' 


o 


o 


FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 


Dale of Ironscrlplion, 


8/28/73 


.X 


. Jlir . was interviewed athis 

> employment The~>miericanShip BuiXdfng Company, Lorain, Ohio, 
at fthieh time he- furnished the following signed statement: 


% 


1 make this free 


and voluntary aftat^rngnlv ?-r| ' ““ “‘‘fand 

folio have identified themselves 


by- 


to me as special agents of the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation. 


-’Agent’ I I furnished me. with an interrogations 
advice* of rights form- which X head,: understood the-** 
meaning of, and executed the waived section o£ this 
form. 

have teen employed by, American Ship Building" 
Company sihee March of' 1568. X am presently the 
I I ahd ’ previo usly h&Ld position. 


of 


l- 


* My salary in March of 1968 When X began r 
employment with' this compahy was $8,666.00 and hy 
present salary sSr of 4hgUst I973 is |i6,30Q.06. 

’’In cbhnectio.n with bonuses recieved from 
American Ship. JBduduj^.'Co^ah^> X recTeVed hone in 
1968, and may' have recievediohe in botlTl^iSg: ahd 1970* 
but X/am not . sure of TSKis.. pi the .years 1971 and 
1972 X recall recitving, a bonus of about 45,066.66 
each year. This 'Ephus would he paid by regular 
payroll check . and would be less deductions for: . . : 

taxes j etc . X can not recall the exact, het amount ’ 
of these, bonuses’. 

^In*. connection wib* 1 stock options at Aaerican 
Ship Building Company X have two options to . purchase 
500 shares, of . stock each, one option being in the 
range of $21.00 per Share and the other option at 
about $22,00' per share. These options will expire 
in 1975 or 1976 and to date X havh not purchased any 
. pf the stock* : - ■ ' ------ ■ — * - — — ■ ■ — • 


be 

b7C 


Interviewed on. -1- 8/28/73 


- ol - Xhrain,-Qhlp - • 


.File # _ClpypTnnd 


m. 


..APB: mat" 


&£ 


_Date dfctpted.. 


- 8^9/r 3 , 


b6 

b7C 


Thl$ document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions'' of the JFB1. If -Is the property of lhe*fBl and Is loaned to your~ogenty;. 
it* ond ils^contents^ are hot |o be \di$tribufed<-oulside- your agency. 


88 



O 0 


r cv 56-83 
2 


‘'During? the early part of I972 the exact period . 
of time ianrecaliedp I discussed the presidential 
campaign with mariy of my fellow employees ;* I felt 
that I wanted to contribute in some, way to. the 
re-election ofPresident Nixon as I felt the shipping 
industry was profiting more since the passage, of 
the Maritime Act of 1970 * X. also feel that T. hoped 
indirectly. to bring to the .attention of Mr. GEORGE 
STEINBRENNER, Chairman, ahd. Chief Executive Officer 
of American .Ship Building' Company i that. .1 was persohely, 
interested in the future of the ship bull ding industry 
by backing the NIXOR Administration Tjhich administra- 
tion helped the industry. 

“In particular X recall speaking more with Mr; 

' ROBERT BARTLOME about making a contribution to assist 
in the re-election of President NI?C 0 N, in that; I’ 
inquired ofMr. BARTLOME how I would go about; making 
a contribution. Mr.- BARTLOME said he would, get a 
list of organizations connected ^ith NIXONs re-election 
campaign and that I could /choose one, of these organ- 
izations to contribute too.* .X chose one of. the . . 

organizations, froin a, list, provided me by Mr., BARTLOME $ - 
however X can hot recall the ' name of the orgiahization. 
or committee ^'^but do 1 recall ft h£d the; w.ord ‘Society? * 
in- it. , 

v ^ ^ „ i, 

• J, I also learned sometime arund Eebruary 1972 
from Mr. BARTLOME that X would be recievihg a bonus 
btit X. did not' know the ^ouht of ' the; honus or when 
X would recieve it. - 

“in April .of 1 Q 72 X wrote a .check in the amount. - 
of $1.000.00 on.-mv I _ I 

payable to. the committee mentioned above,.' C gave this; 
check to- lie. BARTLOME "with the implied understanding 
that he; Would see. the check; arrived at its proper 
cfestination. 



b3 

.b6 

b7C 





CV 56-83 
3 


"Also in either late 1971 or early 1972 X 
purchased twb tickets toda political dinner to. be 
held in Washington* D.C. I can not recall the exact 
price of these tickets but they were either $500.00 
or $1,00.00 each. X did not attend this dinner. 

_ The contributions for this dinner were solicited 
by the dinner committee through the mail. X paid 
for' these tickets by personal check, from the Cleveland. 
Trust iBank and probably mailed the check in an 
.'envelope, provided by the committee. 

"Regarding any other political contributions „ 
made in previous years dating back to 1968, I believe 
I possibly made contributions in 1970 and 1971, 
but do not. recall the amounts or to whom the 
contributions were made. X do not recall making 
any contributions during 1968, or 1969., " 

"in connection with any political contributions 
X have described; above, X wish to state that no 
pressure was brought to. bear on me. in any way to 
induce me to make these contributions. I. also 
wish, to state, that the contributions, were made from 
my own earnings and X was not directly 'or indirectly 
reimbursed by, ar^one for the 'cbntrib.utions X made 
of my own free will. 


"AS far as my- banking connections, are concerned, 
my personel banking both savings and. checking are 
handled through, the Cleveland Trust Bank in Xorain, 
Ohio. X do not halve a safty deposit box, and the 
only other bank X do business 'with is Cleveland 
Federal. Savings loan, Where X have, my home mortgage; 

I also wish to; state I have ho, outside source oil, 
income. 

"in connection with my contribution to .the NIXON' 
re-election campaign, I feel the annual bonus X 
recieved from my employment had a bearing on. the 
amount of my contribution* .in- that this bonus afforded 



CV 5^-83 

4 



me a larger amount of money to contribute than if 
I had contributed out of my regular earnings . I wish 
to state however that I felt strong enough about 
the re-election: Of President NIXON that I would 
have contributed some amount of money even if I 
would not have recieved a bonus. 


”1 have read this statement consisting :of 
six pages. I have initialed each page and each 
correction. This statement is true and correct 
to the best of my recolection. 


"57287 T^sT 


\ 


\ 


"Wi tnesses: 
% 


„ SA, FBI, Elyria, Ohio 8/28/73. 
ISA. FBI. Elyria, Ohio, 8 /28/73 . " 


In addition to the above statement, tne roilow 
descriptive data was obtained during the irteryiew: 


Name 

sex 

Race 

Date of Birth 
~7Iace ^of “Birth” 

Height"" — 

-Weight 
Hair 
- Eyes. 

Wife- 

Children: Sons 


Education 


Male 

White 


TT 


jeitbsourgnj Pennsylvania 

’ 6 *~ — — ' 

230 
Blond 
Blue 


be 

b7C 




jESnployment- 

Occupation 

Residence 


American- Ship Building 

Avon L ane , onio ~ ' 

Phone: I I 


Company 

b6 

hlC 



FO-302 (REV. f 1-27-701 


FEDERAL BUREAU: OF INVESTIGATION. 


Datoof !ronscrlption_ 


l&veland ,j0hio.* was .contacted 

at his place of employment and advised o f ;the identities- 
.of I l as Special Agents 

(SAs) of the Federal Bureau, of Investigation (FBI) . 

| was furnished the original and one. 
copy each pf subpoenas dated the t%th *o£ Aygust,- ,1973" 
-issued from the United States District Court* for the „ 
District o f Columbia for the Honorable JOHBJ. SIRICA 
commandin 



■ | I was' specifically advised, by SA| 

that altho ugh each subpoena calls, for | 

I recmested ta thd Uhited, States District Court 
Washington,, D.C. on' .or' before September lj2>. 1D73, that 
the -office of the special prosecutor will Consi der - that 
the subbdena has been .aobropr i atel v answered if 



^ . | |was request ed by, SA 

advise the contacting agents if 

pa s unable to coinply' with any aspects o 


to immediate! 


e subpoenas* 


Interviewed on 


.Dolq dictated,. 


This document contains .neither recommendations no/ conclusions o( the F81. dj is the property of-the fjBI. a/d Is loaned to you* - agency 
Jt and Jts contend ore pot to, ]be dfsthbuted«ouf$jd$ your agenty^; . , 







CV 56-83 
2 


Subsequent to the above personal cont act on the 
same date l I telephonically contacted SA l | at 

the Cleveland, FBI office and stated that after reviewing 
the respective subpoenas with! 


raised the 


ollowing points concerning the subpoenas 


also made reference to the probabilit 


conference \ 7 ith| 

himself but was unsu ccessful, 
may have| ~|contact S 


was, informed that he 
irectly. 





F0^3p2 (R£V t :| 1.-27:70} 

* [. je 

o ' <5 

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 


Date of Ironscrfplton. 



|and 'SA 

I I reiterated the several p oints 

riously mentioned bv l I regarding | 

^ [observations on the subpoenas serve 


on that date by 

.On, rep eating bis observations! fwas 

questioned by SA| las to Aether the several observations 
would inhibit! 



I was also informed by SA l I that. t 
office Of the -special prosecutor* Washington, D.C . would 
consider the subpoenas as having; been answered if | 



Interviewed onl 


.Dale dictated*. 


8 - 24 - 73 : 


jf>Ts document conjoins neither recommendations pot conclusions o/*the FBI. !Ms ,jhe property oMhe. F8I, and is loaned to your* agency* 
s jt and' Its .contends are not fo be distributed outside yoOr agency. " i- 


t 




1*27-70) 

- ,'i 


FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 


Dole ol transcription. 


Cleveland £ Ohio,: was contacted at his place pr employment * 

^ . | Kras aw are of the identities of I 

l aiid | | as Special Agents (SAs) o£ the 

Federal Bureau of Inv estiga tion (FBI) from previous cpntacts 
He was^informe^ iy SA | [ that he “was being: cohtacted. to 


ascertai n the most current position of 
| with regard to the responding i 
subpoenas served on 
on August 20 , 1973. 


id coint 


ring, w 
Jby^SA 



In response, | | adyised that, upon receipt 

of a letter from the* United States depar tment of -.Justice * 
.directed to | | ahd upon the ar rival 

of September 12, 1973 J I will make the requested 



also: noted that the su bpoena, commands 

| **on or before t 

Wednesday, the 12th of Septemb er, 1973 11 an d noted that even 1 
.though 1, or before!* is so listedl I ds \ 7 ithh 0 lding 1 

funtil September 12, 1973 


Tntervlewedon 


.Date dictated. 


ThU docume/it contains neither recarnmendoOonjs nor conclusions oT the. FBI. It U the property of the FB^and U loaned to youc agency; 
it pnd Us contents, ore J not T to Be distfibyted obtjide your regency. 





CV 56-83 
2 


at the. recommendation of 


I I noted that as of that date* August 24, 

1973 1 | had not received the anticipated I„etter from 

the united States Department of Justice* 







August 31, 19,73 
BY COURIER SERVICE 



AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY 
GEORGE M. STEINBRENNER 
ELECTION LAWS 



Reference is made to .the memorandum of Henry ,S. 
Ruth, Ur*, dated August 10, 1973, requesting investigation, 
regarding captioned matter and the prior memoranda of the 
FBI dated August 28 and August 29, 1973, concerning this 
case. 

The Cleveland, Ohio, Office of the FBI advised 
on August 30, 1973* as follows: 



Assoc. Dl(. * 

Asst. 

Airritn. 

Comp, SyM. „ 

FiUs & CoV, 
A Gen.Jnv. .. 
Idont. 
Inspection 
fntelfk . : 


Laboratory --- n 
Plan. & Evolr 4 
Spec. Inv. rir - - 
Training * 


Legal Cpun. 

Cong. Sery. ^- > _ r 
A Crfh. 

^Ri^Oofch 

Vess Of#; 
iepbtfne 
\ctor Set*y 


Robert Lyons Dibble, Vice President in Charge of 
Personnel,. American Ship Building Company, Lorain, Ohio, 
furnished a signed statement Revising he has been employed 
by captioiiod firm since 1967 and currently j earns $17,300 
annually. During the period jl.970 through 1972, he received 
a $5,000 bonus each year and made political contributions 
in 1970 of $500 to Congressman Charles Kosher;. $1,000 to 
Ohio State Republican Financed Ccmsiaittee; and $1,400 to. 
National Democratic Party Dinner Committee which dinner 
hq attended in Washington believed to be chaired by George 
M. Stoinbrenner. In, 1971 hb made no political contributions. 

In 1972 Dibble purchased ti>ro $5 tickets to the 
National Democratic Congressional Dinner', which he attended 
in Washington, D. C. ? two $1,000 tickets for a Republican 
Dinner which ho did hot attend; and $3,000 to a Nixon 
xeolection committee , called "Loyal Americans for Government 
Reform." He believed most solicitation was through the 
mail and recalls ho personal solicitation. Checks would 
haVebeon mailed to various .Committees or delivered per- 
sonally when in Washington. He. said that he was hot . ^ 
coerced in any way by anyone to make political contributions 
and. stated 'his bonus’ may have influenced the size of his 
contribution to the Nixon reelectipn committee in that he 
had more money available to contribute but he feels he would 
have contributed .regardless of the bonus; however, itwould 
have been a lesser , amount. 


JEH/ar 

MAIL ROOM tfej TELETYPE UNIT HI 


SEE NOTE PAGE TWO. 




AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY 


Daniel Kissel/ Measurer, Kinsman Marines Transit 
Division, American Ship Building Company, Cleveland* furnished 
a signed, statement in which he advised -that ho currently earns 
§14,500 annually and in April, 1972, he made a $3,50QCpntfi~ 
bution to an unrecalled Nixon .campaign committee. He deceived 
a $5,000 comply bonus which in no way influenced his contri- 
bution as he would have contributed anyway. He stated the 
largest previous company bonus prior to aforementioned, $5,000 
bonus was for $1,20.0 and during the current year, 1973, he 
received a $1,500 bonus, T * 

Tho Cleveland Office noted that in view of the 
apparent disproportionate size, of tho company bonus and campaign 
contribution of Kissel, consideration should- be given to 
issuing a subpoena for Kissel in. tho event grand, jury testi- 
mony is taken concerning this matter. » 

A detailed interview report form Will be furnished 
to yojii for the. two aforementioned interviews iii the, immediate 
future; The reguested investigation in the memorandum of 
August 10, 1973, hap not as yet been, completed arid you will 
be kept advised of pertinent developments as they occur. 

This document contains, neither recommendations nor 
cbriclusipns of the' FBI. It ' is the property of the FBI and , 
is .leaned to your agency? it. arid its contents are not to be 
distributed outside your agency.; 


NOTE: Original and one forwarded to Special Prosecutor Cox- 

by 0-14 this date. 


- 2 - 





FEDERAL BUREACf Of; INVESTIGATION 

COJVIIViUJSllcAxiONS .SECTION 


0 


NR 002 CV/CODE 

110 / AM NITEL 8/30/73 BAW 

TO DIRECTOR 

WASHINGTON FIELD 
FROM CLEVELAND (56-83) (P) 3P 


AUG 3 01973 
} 



Assoc* Dir. 

Asst. Dir.: 
Admin. _ 
Comp. Syst, 
File 
Gej 
Ident, 
Inspection , 
Intoll. — 


< 2 > 


AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY, GEORGE M.-SIEI NBRENNER, 
ELECTION LAWS (ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION - WATERGATE UNIT) 
00: WFO. 



Laboratory — 
Plan. & Eval. — | 
Spec. Inv. — 

Training 

Legal Coun. — 
Cong. Serv. 

Corr. & Crm. 
Research , 

Press Off 

|Tolephone Rm. J 
Director Sec'y — L-| 




A 


RE CLEVELAND NITEL TO DIRECTOR AND WASHINGTON 
8/28/ 73. 

ROBERT LYON^DIBBLE, VICE PRESIDENT IN CHARGE OF 


iy 


PERSONNEL, AMERICA N SHIP BUILDING CO . . .LORAL N.^OJilO,. FURNISHED 
SIGNED STATEMENT THIS DATE ADVISING IN ESSENCE THAT HE H^S 
BEEN EMPLOYED BY THIS COMPANY SINCE OCTOBER, 1967 TO PRESENT. 
BEGINNING SALARY OF $12,000 HAS INCREASED TO PRESENT SALARY 
OF $17,300. RECEIVED NO BONUSES 1967 THROUGH 1969. FROM 1970 
THROUGH 1972, RECEIVED $5,000 BONUS EACH YEAR. MADE NO. 
POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS- PRIOR TO 1970. IN 1970, MADE FOLLOWING 



POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS: $500.00 TO PERSONAL CAMPAIGN, / oL 

REG-38 <rC - H 14^-^ 

STATE REPuBLtOT* • 

6 l^ 3 


CONGRESSMAN CHARLES MOSHER; $1,000 TO OHIO 

i? 

FINANCE COMMITTEE; $1400 TO. NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PaRTY ‘D l 


END PAGE QNE 




ti 



S i % 

thz 


1- 




J -J ** , 








i * 


6 


Q 


$ 


> 


# 


PAGE TWO 
CV 56-83 

COMMITTEE AND ATTENDED DINNER IN WASHINGTON, WHICH HE BELIEVES 
WAS CHAIRED BY GEORGE M. STEINBRENNER. IN 1971, HE MADE NO 
POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS. 

MADE FOLLOWING CONTRIBUTIONS IN 1972: TWO TICKETS AT 

$5.00 EACH TO NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL DINNER, 

C 

WASHINGTON, D. jl* WHICH HE PERSONALLY ATTENDED; TWO TICKETS AT 
$1,000 EACH FOR REPUBLICAN DINNER BELIEVED CALLED "THE SENATE 
HOUSE-MAJORITY DINNER"; DID NOT ATTEND; $3,000 TO NIXON RE- 

f 

ELECTION COMMITTEE CALLED "LOYAL AMERICANS FOR GOVERNMENT 
REFORM". BELIEVES MOST SOLICITATION WAS THROUGH THE MAIL AND 
RECALLS NO PERSONAL SOLICITATION. CHECKS WOULD HAVE BEEN 
MAILED TO VARIOUS COMMITTEES OR DELIVERED PERSONALLY WHEN IN 
WASHINGTON. y 

DIBBLE ADVISED WAS NOT COERCED IN ANY Wy BY ANYONE TO 
MAKE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND ADVISED BONUS MAY HaVE 
INFLUENCED SIZE OF CONTRIBUTION TO NIXON RE-ELECTION COMMITTEE 

IN that he had more money available to contribute But feels he 

WOULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED REGARDLESS OF THE BONUS; HOWEVER, IT 
WOULD HAVE BEEN A LESSER AMOUNT. 

END PAGE TWO 



4J « » f 


A 


r 


iX 



PAGE THREE 
CV 56-83 

DANIEL^SSEL, T REASURER, KINSMAN MARINE TRANSIT DIVISION. 
OF AMERICA N ;SHIP BUILDING CO., CLEVEL AMJD.^HIO , IN SIGNED 
STATEMENT FURNISHED SIMILAR ACCOUNT OF APRIL, 1972 CAMPAIGN 
CONTRIBUTION AS OTHER SEVEN COMPANY OFFICIALS. KISSEL STATED JfE 

. Of - , ■ 

EARNS $14,500 ANNUALLY AND CLAIMED HE JlAVE $3500 CONTRIBUTION 
TO UNRECALLED NIXON CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE AND RECEIPT OF $5,000_ 
COMPANY BONUS IN NO WAY INFLUENCED HIS CONTRIBUTION AS HE WOULD 
HAVE CONTRIBUTED ANYWAY. ^ 

KISSEL STATED LARGEST PREVIOUS COMPANY BONUS WAS FOR 
$1200 AND HE RECEIVED A $1500 BONUS THIS YEAR, 1973. 

IN VIEW OF APPARENT DISPROPORTIONATE SIZE OF COMPANY BONUS 
AND CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION FOR KISSEL, USDj MAY WISH TO CONSIDER 
ISSUING SUBPOENA FOR KISSEL IN- EVENT GRAND JURY TESTIMONY 
COMMENCES IN THIS- MATTER. 

CLEVELAND SUBMITTING ^ENDING, REPORT. 

^REcrrbi rr^ee-^v i o - l - i - n e — h^-wqrd r s hi . 

ACK FOR ONE TEL LNG FBI HQ CLR 


J 





August 29, 1973 



1- Mr, 

AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY 
GEORGE M. STEINBRENNER 
ELECTION LAWS 


This is to record telephonic advice on this date to 

Mr.|_ lof the Special Pros ecutors Office by 

Special Agent | | of this Bureau concerning the 

following information. 


The Cleveland, Ohio, Office of the FBI advised August 28, 
1973, as follows: 



l and Gordon Stafford, Vice President of Sales, both 
of American Ship Building Company, in signed statements on August 28 
1973, advised that their April, 1972, contributions to the Nixon Campaign ' 
were based on their own personal desires and not solicited in any way | 
by George M. Steiribrenner or any other company officials. Each stated 
that they received net amounts of company bonuses which are identical to 
the amounts contributed and stated Same is due merely to coincidence I 
and that eyen if they had not received bonuses, they still would have made 
the contributions. * ' 



Each personally stated that his recollection of the circumstances 
[concerning the contributions is based on the truth as he recalls it and 
ach would not hesitate to relate the same account at any judicial proceeding. 


Assoc. Dir, ,, 
Asst. Dir.; 
Admin. 


[ 


]claimed that prior to being shown a photo copy of his 


Comp. Syst. 
Files A Com. , 
Gen. Iny, 

Ident. r ^ r ^- = 
Inspection 
Intel I. . 


LoWrbtory 
Plon. A Evol. , 
Spec. Inv. 
Trofntng 
Lego! Coun. - 
Cong, Serv. 

Corr, & Crm, 
Reseorch 

Press Off.^ 

^Telephone Rm. , 
Director $ec*y » 


checking account Statement for the month of April, 1972, he could only 
recall that the contribution was somewhere between $2, 500 and. $3, 000 
as he is of, such financial means .that such a contribution would not be a 
strain on him and thus not necessarily easily remembered,. 

(4) y. fhis document contains neither' v 

recommendations nor conclusions, of 
/A tlfe FBI,- “ It Is the property of \ 

V ^^fcqe is loaned to your agency? 

>AieP«s contents are not t.o 
Lbuted outside your 


SEE NOTE PAGE TWO. 


MAIL ROOM 



1fr TELETYPE .UNIT CD 



L 



4 

if 


6 




6 


LHM 

Re: American Ship Building Company 


[ 


and 


American 

Ship Building, Lorain, Ohio, in signed statements advised as follows: 


]has been employed by the company since June, 1970, 


and salary ranged from $12, 000 to $16, 000 at present. He received 
a $5, 000 bonus in 1972 netting him$3,650. He stated he discussed the 
Nixon Re-election Campaign with fellow employees and believed Nixon’S 
Re-election would further bolster the security of the Maritime Industry 
as did the passage of the Maritime Act of 1970. He advised the receipt of 
his bonus made it possible for him to make the size contribution he made 
although he would have made some contribution even if he did not receive 
a bonus. This is the only political contribution he has ever made. 


Jo 6 

hlC 


I "h as been employed by American Ship Building from March, 

1968, to the present at a beginning salary of $8,600 and is presently earning 
$16, 300 per year. He recalls receiving bonuses in 1971 and 1972 of about 
$5, 000 each year; He advised he discussed Nixon’s Re-election Campaign 
with other fellow employees and .felt he wanted to contribute in some way 
to the Re-election. He subsequently made a contribution of $3, 000 to one 
of the Committees for the Re-election of President Nixon as he felt this 
would.both assist in the bolstering of the security of the Maritime Industry 
and would also indirectly bring to the attention of Mr. George Steinbrenner 
the fact that he wasper sonally interested in the future of the Ship Building 
Industry by backing the Nixon administration, which administration has 
helped the industry . 


Both ! l each indicated- that they were in no way 

intimidated by their employer to contribute to any political committee 
and made their contributions of their ■ own free will. Both also stated 
that they received no reimbursement or any promise of reimbursement 
for any contribution made. 

NOTE: Original and one forwarded to Special Prosecutor’s Office by 0-14, 
this date. 


1 

■ il 


-2 - 





0 


0 




CV 5.6-83* 

* PAGE TWO 

EACH PERSONALLY STATED THAT HIS RECOLLECTION OF THE 
CIRCUMSTANCESJJE THE CONTRIBUTIONS IS BASED ON THE TRUTH AS HE 
RECALLS IT AND EACH WOULD NOT HESITATE TO RELATE THE SAME 
ACCOUNT AT ANY JUDICIAL PROCEEDING. 

1 CLAIMED THAT PRIOR TO BEING SHOWN, A PHOTO COPY OF 
HIS CHECKING ACCOUNT STATEMENT FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL, 1972, 

HE COULD ONLY RECALL THAT THE CONTRIBUTION WAS SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 
$2500 AND $3000 AS HE IS OF SUCH FINANCIAL MEANS THAT SUCH A 
CONTRIBUTION WOULD NOT BE A STRAIN ON HIM AND THUS NOT 

be 

NECESSARILY EASILY REMEMBERED. b? 



N 

SHIP BUILDING, LORAIN., OHIO, IS SIGNED STATEMENTS ADVISED AS 

FOLLOWS: 

IimM 


[EMPLOYED BY THE COMPANY SINCE JUNE, 1970 AND SALARY 
RANGED FROM $12,000 TO $16,000 AT PRESENT. RECEIVED $5,000 
BONUS IN 1972 NETTING HIM $3650. STATED HE DISCUSSED NIXON 
RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN WITH FELLOW EMPLOYEES AND BELIEVED NIXON’S 
END PAGE TWO 


> 



4 * 


6 


GV 56-83 
PAGE THREE 

RE-ELECTION WOULD FURTHER BOLSTER THE SECURITY OF THE 
MARITIME INDUSTRY AS DID THE PASSAGE OF THE MARITIME ACT OF 
1970. HE ADVISED RECEIPT OF HIS BONUS MADE IT POSSIBLE FOR 
HIM TO MAKE THE SIZE CONTRIBUTION HE MADE ALTHOUGH HE WOULD 
HAVE MADE SOME CONTRIBUTION EVEN IF HE DID. NOT RECEIVE A BONUS. 
HE ADVISED THIS IS- THE ONLY POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION HE HAS EVER 


*i.***K *** ' *- 

made. 




4 * '♦ -** 


WAS EMPLOYED BY AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING FROM MARCH, hie 
1968 TO PRESENT AT A. BEGINNING SALARY OF $8600 AND IS PRESENTLY 
EARNING $16,300 PER YEAR. HE RECALLS RECEIVING BONUSES IN 
i971 AND .1972. OF ABOUT $5,000 EACH YEAR. HE ADVISED HE 
DISCUSSED NIXON'S RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN WITH 1 OTHER FELLOW EMPLOYEES 
AND .FELT HE WANTED TO CONTRIBUTE IN SOME’ WAY TO THE RE-ELECTION. 

HE SUBSEQUENTLY MADE A CONTRIBUTION OF $3,000 TO ONE OF THE 
COMMITTEES FOR THE RE-ELECTION OF PRESIDENT NIXON AS HE FELT 
THIS WOULD BOTH ASSIST IN THE BOLSTERING OF THE SECURITY OF 
THE MARITIME INDUSTRY AND WOULD ALSO INDIRECTLY BRING TO THE 
ATTENTION OF MR., G SqjRG^TEINBRENNER THE FACT THAT HE WAS 
PERSONALLY INTERESTED^! the future of the ship building industry 
END PAGE THREE \ 


§ 






CV 56-83 
PAGE FOUR 

BY BACKING THE NIXON ADMINISTRATION, WHICH ADMINISTRATION HAS 
HELPED THE INDUSTRY. 

BOTH 


EACH INDICATED THAT' THEY WERE IN 
NO WAY INTIMIDATED BY THEIR EMPLOYER TO CONTRIBUTE JO ANY 
POLITICAL COMMITTEE AND MADE THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS OF THEIR OWN 
FREE -WILL. BOTH ALSO STATED THAT THEY .RECEIVED NO' REIMBURSEMENT 
f OR ANY .PROMISE OF REIMBURSEMENT FOR ANY CONTRIBUTION MADE. 

END ; 


FBIHQ FLC ;CLR 


bo 

b7C 


' *jff*&* - ‘ ** IS*#* ** % * 



- 't 


■< 




PLAINTEXT 


TELETYPE 


1- Mr. 





TO SAC CLEVELAND (56-83) 

FROM’ DIRECTOR FBI (5.6-^737) 

\ ' ' American' ship building company; george m.^steinbrenner; 

ELECTION. LAWS (ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION - WATERGATE UNIT.) 
OP.: WFO. 

' REBUCAIr TO CLEVELAND THIS DATE.- 

* 

' , THIS I&TO CONFIRM INSTRUCTIONS .IN REBUCAL AS FOLLOWS: 
THIS. CASE WAS. DISCUSSED 9/7/73 WITH 


b6 

hlC 



Ai*6c\ Dfr. , 
Ajsf. lD(r,; 
'Aomin. 


Comp/Sy*** 

File* & .Corn. ^ 
Geni foV« y -. , 

fdertt, * i 

In *pep J lorv ■*«.*. 
Intel!.'/ 


ASSISTANT SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, "AT WHICH TIME HE ADVISED AS 
‘ FOLLOWS,: J Tip) CLEVELAND OFFICE SHOULD PROCEED WITH THE SCHEDULED} 
INTERVIEW OF"' STEINBRENNER: ON MONDAY 9/10/73. INTERVIEWING 

AGENTS,, AFTER ADVISING STEINBRENNER OF HIS RIGHTS, SHOULD 

^ ■ . ■ ' ' ^ , ■ ■ * 

Question jaitf iif. detail concerning, the possible election laws 

: viOLATiON,. SECTION 6lO, TITLE 1$, USC. WHILE, STEINBRENNER SHOULD 

NOT BE SPECiFICALLY QUESTIONED CONCERNING A POSSIBLE 00 J VIOLATION, 

~ * * TJ1 ~ 

THAT IS, THE FABRICATION OF THE DECEPTIVE COVER STORY TOLD BY 
r^HE .COMPANY OFFICIALS DURING THEIR INTERVIEWS, INFORMATION 

* 7' < i * 

CONpERNING THIS AND ANY OTHER VIOLATIONS SHOULD BE ACCEPTED IF 

SD LOGICAL QUESTIONS ASKED IN THAT REGABDj 

. « RF0.7R ./*-/ /Ml 

if' WFO’ ; (info) 

BZ SEP II 1979 






Laboratory * 

•' fjan. S^EvaU 
t Spec. Invy .j;.. . „■ 

I , iTralnln^ _ 

| . LegolkCourt. ^ ^ 

' Contf. 

C'orr, & Crm. 
*Hjt»eofeh 

I fv.ii oii. 


tfJC/atap (4) 

iff 



Telephone^Rm. __ 

DjrecterSec.]/ 


TELETYPE UNIT 



SEE .NOTE PAGE TWO... 

" Eur^'y c? t::.u 




"^Vr * * r r* 

>Vv * ** *s'i s* v w. w J „ * „ J 


r t. 


4 # . ' v 




u 





0 

NITEL TO SIC CV . 

RE: AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY 




6 


ADDITIONALLY, YOUR OFFICE SHOULD ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY ANY - 
INFORMANTS OR OTHER SOURCES NOW OR PREVIOUSLY EMPLOYED BY THAT 
COMPANY WHO COULD BE CONTACTED AT A. LATER DATE FOR INSIDE 
INFORMATIONS NO OTHER INVESTIGATION IS TO BE CONDUCTED AT “ 
THIS TIME EXCEPT THAT * ANY INFORMATION VOLUNTEERED SHOULD £E 
ACCEPTED AND IMMEDIATELY. REPORTED.. 

THE RESULTS OF THE MONDAY INTERVIEW WITH STEINBRENNER 
SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY DEPORTED TO FBIHQ BY TELETYPE FOLLOWED 
BY A REPORT. - 

MAIL COPY TQ WFO* 


NOTE* Above dissuasion w ith Mr,. 
Section Chief Long and SA 


was had today by b6 

b7G 


**■ ReBucal was ina.de by Section. Chief Long to. SAC F. Fehl, 

4 Cleveland.- 



r 


f EOERAC BUREAU Of lNVESIKSATlOfl— 
COMMUNICATIONS SECUOt^ 

SEP 101973 

KEi-EXYEE 


NR 006 CV CODE 

8:35 PM NITEL 9-10-73 CLP 

TO DJR^CT0R.C56-4737) 

FROM CLEVELAND (56-83) 


AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY; GEORGE MTsT El NB RENNER; 
ELECTION LAWS (ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION - WATERGATE 
UNIT); oo:!washington FIELD. 


RE BUREAU TELETYPE TO CLEVELAND, 9-7-73. 

A HIGHLY PLACED CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE AT THE AMERIAN 
SHIP BUILDING COMPANY, CLEVELAND, OHIO, ON THE MORNING OF C\|ry 
9-10-73 ADVISED THAT GEORGE M. STEINBRENNER, CHAIRMAN 
AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THER AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY IS 
CURRENTLY IN WASHINGTON, D. C. STEINBRENNER, 1DING TO 

SOURCE, ALONG WITH HIS ATTORNEYS, IS CONFERRING 
REPRESENTATIVES OF SPECIAL ATTORNEY ARCHTffAu) COX, APPARENTLY 
REGARDING HIS INTERESTS IN THE CURRENT CAMPAIGN WJiERKUT^IOlf^ 1 
INVESTIGATION INVOLVING HIS FIRM AND OFFICERS OF $;|S$'PIRffi.^"^ 

^-\ xsSSSS* 

END \ * ' 



COX, APPARENTLY 


PLS ACK FOR THREE TELS 
CKG FBIHQ ACK FOR THREE 


■ ■ ■ 

< 1 * % 


<5 8 SEP 1 ' 




HOLD 


'A 


V / 

V 

v*‘ 

NR 019 CV CODE 
10:38 PM NITEL 9/^l/73 JSM 
TO DIRECTOR ^(^6-4737) 

FROM CLEVELAND (56-83) 2P 


federal: bureau qe investigation 
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION 




AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY; GEORGE M. STEINBRENNER; 
ELECTION LAWS (ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION - WATERGATE 
UNIT); 00 WASHINGTON FIELD OFFICE. 


[Assoc. Dir. r — 
ksst. Dir.$ 


Admin. 



Inspection , 
Inloll. 


Laboratory — 
Plan. & Eval. 
Spoc. lnv. _ 
Training , - 
Legal Coun. __ 
Cong. Serv. — 

Corr. & Crm. 
Research _ 

Press Off. _ 
Telephone Rm. 
Director Sec’y 


RE CLEVELAND TELETYPE TO BUREAU, 9/10/73. 

ON THE MORNING OF 9/11/73, A HIGHLY PLACED CONFIDENTIAL 
SOURCE IN THE AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY, CLEVELAND, OHIOV^ 

b7C 

ADVISED THAT INFORMATION AVAILABLE INDICATES THAT GEORGE M. 

/ 

STEINBRENNER IS STILL IN WASHINGTON, D.C. CONFERRING WITH 
HIS ATTORNEYS AND POSSIBLY WILL BE CONFERRING WITH REPRESEN- 
TATIVES OF THE COX COMMITTEE. SOURCE UNAWARE OF WHETHER IN 
FACT STEINBRENNER OR HIS ATTORNEYS HAD S&^N CONTACT WITH 
THE COX COMMITTEE ON 9/10/73 OR IF WHEN CONTACT EFFECTED WHaT 



jf- 


MAY BE THE DISCUSSIOJ^QJJ S C ' ^7 ^>1 " I J 

SOURCE STATED STEINBRENNER IS TENTATIVELY EXPECTED TO 

RETURN TO CLEVELAND ON THURSDAY, 9/13/73) BUT IT IS NOT 

* 

END PAGE ONE 


t SEP 121973 


: P4SE 




P 1 81973 -' 










CV 56-83 |t 

PAGE TWO 

KNOWN WHETHER STEINBRENNER MAY BE AVAILABLE FOR INTERVIEW 
AT THAT TIME. 

SOURCE NOTED SUBPOENAS CURRENTLY BEING SERVED BY U.S. 



END 

DLM FBI V HQ CLR 


FD-36 (Rev. 5-22*64) 




Transmit the following in 


Airtel 


Date: 9r7-73 


(Type in plaintext or code) 


(Priority) 


DIRECTOR 


, fbi 


FROM: SAC, CLEVELAND (56-83) (P) 

re: American ship building company 

GEORGE M. STEINBRENNER 
ELECTION LAWS 

(ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION - 
WATERGATE UNIT) 

00: Washington Field Office 


Re Bureau airtels of 8-16-73 and 8-29-73, enclosing 
subpoenas regarding instant matter. 

Enclosed for the Bureau are the originals of 10 
subpoenas issued fori | 



The Bureau will note 7 of the subpoenas instruct a * 
return on or before 9-12-73 while the remaining 3 are for a 
return on or before Tuesday, 9-4-73. b3 

All I l have been obtained and the 

enclosures should be returned to the appropriate clerk, USDC, 
District of Columbia. $T 100 r >rn oq , ^ 

„ ' REG-^8 j- 6-</? 3 7- [§> 

\2r Bureau (Enc. 10) (RM) esma assasa K , 

T- HF0 (IKF0) 'VT.IOFO Ix,0-1/K 

2 - Cleveland A SEP 14 1973 j 

MVH:kl[^JS®S ll'lb 3 


70 SEP 141973 


Approved: 


^Speci^l |Ag^n0ir ®)M)ge 


.M Per 


GPO : 1970 O -’402-735 



"' v ^Dr263 t (Rev!l2-19-67y 

irfe-r 


OF I N VIQSTI G ATI ON 


REPORTING OFFICE 


rOFFlCE OF ORIGIN 


INVESTIGATIVE PERIOD 


WASHINGTON FIELD 9/10/73 I 8/31/73 - 9/7/73 


CLEVELAND [WASHINGTON FIELD 9/l( 

TITLE OF CASE ^ , report made by 

. CA.I 

AMERICAN SHIR BUILDING COMPANY chaTO 
GEORGE ,M. STEINBRENNER 


| TYPED OY 


ELECTION LAWS 

(ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION - ^ 
WATERGATE UNIT) ' . 


REFERENCES 




Cleveland report of SA l~ L '8/30/73. 

Bureau teletypeto Cleveland, 9/7/73. , I 


I ^ TO.fc BIESTAE ? m 
\ '*S5p“ - - ■T'j^su 


ENCLOSURES. 


id for tile Bureau are 




■p/ mn 

Vs its 


ACCOMPLISHMENTS- CLAIMED 


--Dissemination Rccord.ot Attached Report 

Agincy . ~Q.y- Q>{ZnJkfc: 

■Request Rcc<L ' Jjf jJ. oL. jt V. ” . V. . 


CASE HAS BEEN: 


PENDING'OVER ONE YEAR a yes atw 
P ENDING. PROSECUTION ; ’* 

OVER SIX MONTHS □ yes htino 


DO HOT WRIX&-IN SPACES BELOW 



■Date Fwd. |, 


How Fwd. 





J53SEP.241973 

. \t ,' / 


COVER PAGE 




*<ttO i J»?lw 44*.£29 









FD-204 (Rev. 3-3*5?) 


N^E 




UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

FEDERAL -BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 


Copy lot - 

Report of: SA| bo . ? - Office: CLEVELAND, OHIO 

Date: 9/10773 ! b7C 

Field Office File 56“ 83 - Bureau File #: 56“ 4-7 37 

Title: - AMERICAN SHIP JBUILDING COMPANY 

GEORGE M. STEINBRENNER J . ' ' 

Character: ELECTION LAWS 


Synopsis: 



-ENCLOSURES: To the Office of'the Special Prosecutor, , 

U.-S. Department of Justice, Washington, UjG..t 


r 


j b3 


frhU document contains neither recommendations. nor conclusions of the FBI, It,is the property of the FBI andis lo&ned to your agency; it^and its contents 
are not to be distributed outside your agency. 

0. S, GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE ; *970 O - -406*840 












0- . o 


CV 56-83 
2 


b3 

be 

b7C 


I [ attention Iras draw! to the fact that 

the subpoena is returnable on or -before Tuesday, the fourth b6 
of September-, 1973, as opposed to .the data listed on the b7c 

previous subpoena in this matter . ' r 






FD-302 l$EV, 1 1 -274-70} 


FEDERAL ^BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS 


Date 1 of tronscrjplion 


'id the serving, of a 'shbpoena phi 




Interviewed on.; 


Cleyeiand 3 : Ohio 


'CldYeienh $ 6-83 


_Oate dictated* 


9/5/73 


This, document contains neither recommendoUons. nor conclusions the £81, It is lhe_ property of the FBI and; Is loaned ‘to .your agency;, 
it and Its contents ore not to be distributed outside your agency* ’ * ^ 


|$; ; w ty 

grff .Vo y 

€ 



Dat§, dictated. 


Cleveland 56 r 83 
9/6/73 


document contains Neither recommendations nor ^conclusipns <*f the 1F8). 0 is the property t o( the fBI and^Ts loanedjo your ogency; 
Jt and jts contents ore not to be distributed ^outside ypur agency. * ~ - 


fos l rv 

JL / . 






FD-302 IREV* 1 I^27-70J 

0 o 


0 n 

- FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION*/ 

'H - * «» 

r 

1 

t 

^ \ 

Date of transcription, 



Sub i 

iernipnt tn fche> gerPl no of * gtiKn/vana n 

31, 1973. onl 





eyeiana, OhioJ teas. recontacted on Septembe 

at 'which time he Provided I 


Interviewed, oh 


.Date dictated. 


fhts document contains neither 'recommendation* nor cppcfoslons"o( the^FBf. It (s.lfie property of the F8J'and t* loaned to your agency; 
il ^dnd j^s contents ore 'hot to bp distributed outside youf’agency;. 








- Inlervi8w ^ ■ 9/h/j3 ■ . V ■■ — Fi l e ^ Clfvej La n3 ^ g6 -8 3 - 


% . 


"by- 




-mrw - 


■ bo 

Jo7G 


„Oa)e dictated* 


J ' ^ * . < ' 

This document' conjoins neither recommendations mor c<^n<jusiQn$ o( iKe F8I. ^t,- is^the piropecty of the'. FBI and- i^ioanedUo, your *opency* 

It and Its Contents ar^ not Jo be distributed outside, your agency* 

*._*''* $ 

* * - *• h\ 




fa-302 {REV. I ) -27-70) 


FEDERAL BUREAU* OF .INVESTIGATION' 


Date oHra ascription 


1 S ubsequent to the se 
3U 1973 on 




or a subpoena oh August 



Cleveland, Ohio 
at frhich time he 


as recontacted on September 



Interviewed ,on_ 


.Date dictated. 


P/6/73 


Jhis document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions pf the FBI, iMs-ihe property 6f the FBI ond l^ loaned Jo .your agency; 
it and[ its coofenfs pre mot to be distributed outside your agency* 










FO-302'(REV.,ll-27-7.p) 


:0 

o. 


FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIO 


0 

.0 V 

Dale of lronscrlpllon_ 




9/6/73, 


31. 1973. OG 


mis recontacted on Se 




Interviewed on 

9/4/73 

Clevelandj Ohio 

• at ^ ' - 

v Cleveland 56-83 

Rile# • -- 

SA'f 

by L 


b7C 

9/6/73 . 

Date dictated - ^ 

^ “ ■’ ■ " * 

This document contains neither 
It and 1 Its* ‘contents ore 'not, to 

recommendations nor conclusions df.lhe fBI. It fr the property of the FBI and Is loaned to your Gge/icyr< 
be distributed outside, your agency. 




F0-30?(REV. I l-2f-70)- 


r 


$■ 


8 


FEDERAL BUREAU OP INVESTIGATIO 


Q 

0 


Date of Iranscflplion 



r 


-LL- 


] 


American Sh3^JBuild^^ PI C^ve» laf»d r 

Ohip^was contacted by Special Agent 


the availability' for interview of GEORGE M. STEM 
Chairman: and Chief Executive. Officer off that Company. 


^Clevela 
| conce 
BEEKNER, 


concerning 


| l advised that In view .of the recent 

publicity including; radio and newspaper publicity concerning 
Mr, S^ZNffltENSPpi.'sr campaign contribution to thd Nixon . " p 

election, STE11IBRERNER would not be reporting to his office ^ 
on that date, September 5, 1973,' and on. Thursday 
September 6, 1973, STEINBRERNER had a tentative business 
appointment in Indiana . 

| | stated he would recontact SA. I • 

regarding the availability Of :jSTE,liroRENHER on September 7 ,. - 
' 1973 .' 1 


On Friday, September 7, 1973, 


advised 


that Mr. STEIMBRENNER was hot; in Cleveland on that date 
and would' either he n in New Tori: City ,or in Washington* B.Ci, 
end thus was not, available .for interview. _ 


f , 

Stated he would, be in contact With 

SA | ~| on -Monday. 'September 10, 1973, and if possible 
at that time,. adyiSe. regarding Mr. STEINBRE2^ER * s 
availability f or interview* . 


9/5/73 


Interviewed on. 


at Cl exr&f nnfl $ Ohio 


by. 


■SA 


b6 


♦ Imp ,, b7C _ n Dote dictated 


iFile’ ^ Cleveland 56-83 
9/10/73. 


IMs document contains neither re<ommendqtiops mor conclusions- of the F8L (I Is Ihe property of the FBI and Isjqbnecf’lo your agency; 
It ,an& Its 'tonlenJs ore not to be distributed oulside your agency. , .* ' ~ 



' - 1 


4\ 

NR 007 CV CODE 
8:20 


A H- b ' "l tr.EAtr OF 1 'C£3TiCAT!C:) 

Q'* C0\;;,fcNICAT!0.\S SECT.Q* 

’» lo 1373 



PM NITEL 9/13/73 SLO 
TO DIRECTOR 56-4737 



6 


WASHINGTON FIELD 
FROM CLEVELAND 


56-83 




[Assoc. Dir. - 
{Asst. Dir.: 
Admii}. — i- 
Comp. Syst, 
Files & Coj 
Gen.. In; 
Ident. 

| {Inspection . 
In tel I . — 


CP 


b6 

b7C 


cO 

GEORGE Ml. STEINBRENNER: ELECTION’ 


AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING CO., .; 

(ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION - WATERGATE UNIT); 00: WFO 


I oborotory - 
Ian. & Eval. — | 
sec. Inv. . 
Training _ 

I Legal Coun. 

Cong. Serv. 

rSws” 



RE CLEVELAND TEL TO BUREAU, 9/11/73. rib 

ON THE MORNING OF 9/13/73, A HIGHLY PLACED CONFIDENTIAL S0<]&CE IN 
THE AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING CO., CLEVELAND, OHIO, ADVISED THAT GEORGE 
M. STEINBRENNER IS CURRENTLY EN ROUTE FROM FLORIDA TO WASHINGTON, D.C. 
AND WILL ALSO BE IN WASHINGTON, D.,C. ON FRIDAY 9/14/73. 

SOURCE UNWARE OF STATUS OF STEINBRENNER' S. DEALINGS WITH, COX 
COMMITTEE AND ALSO DOES NOT KNOW THE ANTICIPATED PLANS OF STEINBRENNER 
WEEK OF 9/17-21/73. 

IT APPEARS THE POSSIBILITY EXISTS THAT STEINBRENNER IS UNAVAILABLE 


END PAGE 'ONE 



*h 


22 SEP 141973 


w 


|Corr. & Crm. 
Research 

Press Off. 

Telephone Rm. , 
Director Sec'y _ 



CV 56-83 
PAGE TWO 

PENDING THE SERVING OF ADDITIONAL SUBPOENAS ON I 

AND THEIR FGJ TESTIMONY 

IN WASHINGTON, D.C. 

CLEVELAND WILL MAINTAIN CONTACT WITH SOURCE RE 
ST El NB RENNER’ S AVAILABILITY AND REPORT SAME TO BUREAU. 
END 

CKG FBI HQ CLR 


ACK FOR TWO 


«■ 

v f 



SEP 17/1973 

•Vbletype 


-6 

s* ^ST 

NR 012 CV CODE 
10:15 PM N1TEL 9/17/73 JSM 
TO DIRECTOR (5 6-4737) 

WASHINGTON FIELD 
FROM CLEVELAND (56-83) CP) 2P 

4— 

ELECT ION LAWS (ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SE 
UNIT); 00 WASHINGTON FIELD OFFICE. 


9/13/73. ,,ttu HTGHLY PLACED 

FOR INFORMATION OF COW a»Y, 

CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE AT THE AMERICA ^ ^ 

aEVELAND, OHIO FOR INTERVIEW 

and, believed to be proceeding to washingto D.C «■ 

FLORIDA AND LIKELY WILL BE IN WASHINGTON, D.C. AT LEAST 

TUESDAY, mvn AND POSSIBLY " mt BE 

AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED, IT APPEARS «0»gg 

end PAGE ONE , 9l 3 




S»«P20ij(J 






CV '56-83 


0 


0 


PAGE TWO 

UNAVAILABLE FOR INTERVIEW AT LEAST WHILE, PERTINENT FEDERAL 
GRAND JURY IN .WASHINGTON; D.C. IS HEARING TESTIMONY FROM 




OPTIONAL FOKM NO. 10 
MAVI»« IDIT'iN 

oja ccn, uc. NO. a; 

UNITED STATES 


RNMENT 


Memorandum 


& 



SUBJECT: 


9/26/73 


1- Mr. Gebhardt 

1- Mr. Long 

1- Mr. I 


Mr. date: 9/26/73 

\) n ,L/ jr 1- Mr. Gebhard 

R. E. Long/K^f X- Mr Long 

AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY CLev&LAnA. OhtO 

GEORGE M. STEINBRENNER 

ELECTION LAWS 

(ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION - 
WATERGATE UNIT) 


On the afternoon of 9/25/73, Attorney T 
.the S pecial Prosec utor 's Office telephonica] 
Ivisor I I that 


.advisee 


lypecflon _____ 

Intel) 

Labor otory ■ 

Plon. & Eval. 

Spec. Inv. __b 6 
Training - — I- 7 C 
Legal Coun. _____ 
Telephone Rm. __ 


/ 

k /0 


I Cleveland , has-been in vJted to testify 
before the FederalTgrand^TOryT Washington, JD.„..C.«_< 


advised that 
although I 


is not a target oi 


Mr-. I 

grand jury 


At the request of the Special Prosecutor's Office, our 
Cleveland Office has, interviewed eight executives of captioned 
firm to obtain their explanations of contributions to CRP 
attributed to these officers in amounts varying between 
$2,800 and $35500. These officers whose annual salaries 
were in the range of $155000 to $20,000 admitted they made 
contributions as indicated, admitted that they received 
company bonuses at about the time they made the contributions, 
in the approximate amount of the contributions, but claimed 
they would have made the political contmbujXLon even if they 
had not received t* — 


)onuses. Our Cleveland Office also 


CAN/amm (} 

CUNhcf 


i> i>QWi 81973 1 


X w J ^ ^ —7~7 3 J t 

/thg£/ CONTINUED - 0VE$ 

£31 


OCT 2 V9i 


Cl 

'PFPC^ir 


EC^tfNll/ 





t: 






PLAINTEXT 


O 


FACSIMILE 


1- 


Mr . 


be 

hlC 


IMMEDIATE 



it 


h* 

h 




TO:%^AC, Cleveland (56-83) 

FROM: Direct^, FBI ^ f ^ 



10/17/73 


PERSONAL ATTENTION 


AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY 
GEORGE M#STEINBRENNER 
ELECTION LAWS 

(ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION 
WATERGATE UNIT) 

00: WFO 


/o -y 


/ 




ReBucal to SAC, Cleveland, 10/16/73. 

Attached for Cleveland is a copy of 10/15/73 
request from Henry S. Ruth* Jr., Special Prosecutor’s 
Office, and for WFO' in a sealed envelope is one copy 
Of same request. 

This investigation is to be afforded highest 
priority and .security. Cleveland to assign most capable 
personnel to achieve prompt positive results* Cleveland 
to submit daily summary teletype until matter is resolved. 


A 





Attachment 

,\v/ 

<P 1- WFO (Mail. Copy) (Personal Attention) (Attachment) 

NOTE: ReBucal made by 'Section Chief Long to SAC Fehl: 10/16/73 

in which SAC was advised as above. 


JJC/amm 

OJ0\ 



I oc. Dir. 
t, Dir.i 
Jmin. .. . 
>onp. Syst. 
xt. Affairs 
( iles & Com. 
!«n. Inv. 


dent. 

Inspection 

Intel*!. 

obofatory „ 
Ian. & Evah 



MAIL ROOM 


FEDERAL - BUREAU DF INVESTIGATION 

COMMUNICATIONS SECILQN 


°pr 171973 



\ 



I* 






A 

WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE 

Memorandum 


0 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 


to :Clarence M. Kelly 
Director 

Federal Bureau of Investigation 
)ATTN: Accounting & Frauds Section 

pitf^tHenry S. Ruth, Jr. 
h) 0 \ Deputy Special Prosecutor 

Watergate. Special Prosecution Force 


date: oct. 

n 


15, 


I 

i 


SUBJECT 







In the course of our investigation into 
possible violations b y/American Shipbuilding Company] 
and its. officers and employees or federal statutes 
relating to. corporate political contributio ns and 
instruction of Justice, we have interviewedf 


■&2Z3. 


Assoc. Dir. — 
Asst Dir.: 

Admin. 

Comp. Syst. 
Ext. Affairs 
Files 
Gen. In' 
Ident. 
Inspection 
Intel!. 


] 


Laboratory 

Plan. & EvaL _ 

Spec. Inv. 

Training 

Legal Coun. 

Telephone Rm. — 
Director Sec’y 


or American anipDUiiaing. [ 


that he has spoken several 
chemist with. Protective Chemicals, a 
company . Be ginning a round Labor Day Weekend, 1973, 


times with !" i , <*>-- 

Cleveland chemical 



laskedl 


for information concerning the 
Ame rican Shi pbuildin g by, the~ Special 
]has told l | t hat he 



investigation - ©! 

Prosecutor's Office .[ . 

has a "source" clo se to - , th e Special Proseuutor ' s Office 
This "source" told l I that if George ^fteinbrenner 

(the Chairman and Chief Executive urncer or American”" 
Shipbuilding) 'came to, the Special Prosecutor's Office 
and acknowledged his participation in an illegal 
corporate, political contribution, this of fice woul d' not 
pres s anv obst ruction of Justice charges. I l also* 




Special 


as late, as September 18,- that .the door to' 
Prosecutor ' s Of f ice was still open . . n 




Department of Justice would agree to a settlement o f an 
antitrust action against American Shipbuilding by 
accepting the divestiture of 3 s hips by th e c 
That advice p roved to: be. correct ♦ ! | has also" 

told l I that .the Government would not appascatg 

shipyard acquisition by American Shipbuilding while the 
company was involved in the present investigation. 

That information has, thus far, proved to be accurate.- \ 







should' be interviewed as soon as • 

^ . ... close' to - . 

the. Special Prosecutor’s Office . I ~1 should' a lso - be. 


possible to: determine the: name o f his “source 11 


Jand with 


questioned as to: his conversations with:[ 
his "source. " The' nature of each of those conversations, 
should be establis hed inclu ding the date, of the, 
conversation, what I | asked to; be. done,, and what : 

information about .the Special Prosecutor’s in vest igatio 
was obtaine d from th e* "source" and relayed! to: 


3 


In addition| ]should be. questioned, as to: the basis 

for his information about- .the Department of Justice - 
what information has he' obtained about .the'. Department , 
from whom,* when, under wha t circumst ances .• and what * 
information was relayed to. | 

If further, clarification qf this investigative 
request' is; required, please contact 
Associate: Special Prosecutor. 


T 



i 

% 



. j 




3 


A 


Ic 


* 


if 




•bo 

b7C 



r~ 







NR 003 CV PLAIN W 

230 PM URGENJ/i 0-19-73 CLP 
TO DIRECTjrf, EBI (56-4737) 

WFO ' 

FROM CLEVELAND (56-83) 3 PAGES 


FEDERAL BUREAU CF 1 NV£ST.G>Oi 
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION 




OCT X 9 1373 

telexes 



Assoc. Tm 
Asst T)*.\ 
Adminf , 




Comp. Syst 

Ext Affairs 

Fifes, 



Laborat ry 

Plan. & EvaL 

Spec. Lnv. „ 

Training * 

Legal Coun. - 

Telephone lira. _L 
Director Sec*y _ 


AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY, GEORGE M. STEINBRENNER , 
'ELECTION LAWS. (ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD ’ SECT 10 N-WATERG ATE UNIT) 

M 

00 tWFO. 



RECVTEL^Jj3-19-73. 


^J//L 


|aPPEARED at THE CLEVELAND / OFFICE ON 
THE MORNING OF 10-19-73, EXECUTED A VOLUNTARY APPEARANCE FORM 
AND FURNISHED PHOTOSTATIC COPIES OF TOLL RECORDS FOR 
6/29-10/2/73 FOp/THE TELEPHONE NUMBERS ISSUED TO HIS PLACE OF 
EMPLOYME NT ^ROTECT I VE .C HEM1CALS..-1NC . , CLEVELAND. OHIO . THE 
TOLL RECORDSFURNISHED ARE IDENTICALjrOvTHOSE PREVIOUSLY 
CONFIDENTIALLY OBTAINED BY TH^f&M?AND/OFFICE ON 10-18-73. 

-•'a m-ioo > 

ICOUNT FOR 



STATED THAT HE CAN 


b6 

b7C 


FOR ALL CLEVELAND ^ f 

REC-45 kJZ' $73 7' e^f 

CEJD TO HIS BUSINESS 


TO WASHINGTON, D.C. TELEPHONE CALLS PLA^Ip^TO 

NUMBERS AND VERIFIED PHONE CALLS PLACED TO WASHINGTON,D.C. 

’ as OCT 291973 

STATED THAT TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE NO OTHER TELE- 


END PAGE ONE 


a* 

is BOV 1 1gfe U 






PAGE TWO 
CV 56-83 


PHONE CALLS WOULD HAVE BEEN PLACED TO WASHINGTON,D .C. AND ANY 


SUCH CALLS RELATING TO 



THE COX COMMITTEE OR ANY 
BEEN PLACED $mr 


WASHINGTON, D.C. LAW FIRMS WOULD HAVE BEEN PLACED 


NOTED HE RECALLS RETURNING A TELEPHONE CALL TO| 

TO A WASHINGTON,^. LAW FIRM WHICH EMPLOYED ATTORNEYS 
] aND | ~| WHQ HE BELIEVES WERE REPRESENTING THE 

\ SUBPOENAED BY THE COX COMMITTEE. HE 
ALSO RECALLS A SECOND CALL PLACED SEVERAL WEEKS LATER TO A LAW 


FIRM REPRESENT ING|_ 
WITH HIS ATTORNEY^ 
RETURNED HIS CALL. 


AND AT THAT TIME] 
(PH) ANDP 


|WAS TIED UP 

lsUBSEQUENTLY 


REITERATED THAT ANY CONVERSATIONS HE 


WOULD HAVE HAD WITH 


CONCERNING GEORGE STEINBRENNER 


OR THE AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY WOULD HAVE BEEN MERELY 


ADVICE OFFERED FREELY TO 


AND IN NO WAY REPRESENTED ANY 


KIND OF KNOWLEDGE BASED ON ANY OUTSIDE INFORMATION FROM ANY' OTHER 
PERSONS ANYWHERE. 

I I STATED THA T DURIN^THE INTERVIEW ON THE 


EVENING OF 10-18-72 


lACCORDING TO 


TELEPHONED 


END PAGE TWO 



"j •wwr* * — 


ft 



0 


PAGE THREE 
CV 56-83 


HIS RESIDENCE TWICE* IN ADDITION, ACCORDING. TO 

4 ' 

TO meet* with! 


HE' WAS 


THIS DATE SUBSEQUENT TO LEAVING; THE FBI 


OFFICE. 


be 

b7C 


ADVISED THAT HE; HAD TELEPHONED. 

THURSDAY EVENING, 1 , 10-18t73 CONCERNING HIS INTERVIEW BY THE FBI 

DID NOT .SHOW ANY SURPRISE CONCERNING; THE SUBJECT 


;AND‘ THAT 


MATTER OF THE INTER VIEW;. 


ADVISED AT THE TIME HE 


APPEARED IN: THE CLEVELAND* OFFICE' ON "10-19-73 THAT HE: HAD NO 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THIS MATTER OTHER THAN THAT 


OBTAINED. BY CLEVELAND AGENTS FROM HIM ON' THE. NIGHT OF OCTOBER 


18 LAST... 

REPORT CONTAINING INVESTIGATION IN CLEVELAND 
DIVISION: BEING irMEMATELV’DISPATCHED TO BUREAU'. 

END' 


PLS HOLD; FOR TWO MORE 





Inspection 
Intel!. ~>~ 
Laboratory 
Plan. & Eval* — 
Spec. Inv. . 
Training - 
| Legal Coun. 

I Telephone Em* — 
Director S&c’y 


American ship building compahy, .bbbjujIIUBBMBS. 

ELECTION LAWS. (ACCOUNT* AND FRAUD SECT10N-WATERGATE UNIT), 

00 WEO. 

RE DUREAU TELCALL AND BUREAU AIRTEL, !./«/«. «*«“" ^ 

TELCALL TO WFO, 10/18/73. hie 

REFERENCED BUREAU AIRTEL REQUESTED INVEBTIBATION R 0 

ASSOCIATED. WITH PROTECTIVE CHEMICA LS, A CL EVELA 


CHEMICAL COMPANY AND CONVERSATIONS- BETWEEN 0Ne| 


TOR AMSHIP . . 

INVESTIGATION at CLEVELA ND, OHIO, DETE RMINED TRUE 

IDENTITY OF I I 10 

END PAGE ONE 



F 

SB OCT 29 1973 





• * 


0 



CV 56-83 
PAGE TWO 

CLEVELAND CITY DIRECTORY LISTS 


■V 


PROTE CTIVE CHEMICALS, INC, , 2060 HAMIJ^TAN_AVMUE ^CLEVEL AND, ( /, 
WITH | | RESIDENCE BRUNSWICK, OHIO. 

BUREAU’S ATTENTION DIRECTED TO BUFILE 105-193684, 

CAPTIONED \ 


IS - YU", WHICH, IN BRIEF, INDICATES 
INTERVIEWED BY BUAGENTS, CLEVELAND, IN 1967 AND 1969. 
HE WAS INTERVIEWED RE UNDERGROUND CROATIAN MOVEMENT AND 
POSSIBLE DEMONSTRATIONS. HE ADMITTED PUBLISHING MONTHLY 
NEWSPAPER, CIRCULATION OF ABOUT 150, AND ADVISED HIS 
ATTORNEY, 


, PERMITTED HIM TO USE HIS 
REPRODUCING EQUIPMENT FOR PRODUCING NEWSPAPER. HE 
INDICATED AT THAT TIME HE WOULD 


"BE"| OF SURFATHANE 

HAMILTON AVENUE: 

CHEMICALS, INC., 2060; gg&3g&88goSSfigB& CLEVELAND. 

DESCRIBED AS WHITE MALE; DOBl ISARAJEVO, 


YUGOSLAVIA.; . 5 T 10": 187 POUNDS; BROWN HAIR; BROWN EYES; 
DARK COMPLEXION; NATURALIZED 8/5/66, USDC, CLEVELAND. 
SURFATHANE CHEMICALS, INC. PRODUCED UNDERCOATING FOR 
AUTOMOBILES. 

HAD CONTACTED WHITE HOUSE TO ADVISE OF UNREST 


he 

hlC 


END PAGE TWO 



,’*«*•* 




CV 56-83 
PAGE THREE 

Of CROATIAN ELEMENT IN CLEVELAND, ACCORDING TO U.S. SECRET 
SERVICE IN ,6/69. 


RECORD REVIEWS 

DUNN AND BRADS.TREE.T, INC.,, CLEVELAND, MADE AVAILABLE DATA 
10/18/73 RE PROTECTIVE CHEMICALS, INC. ; I 


PROTECTIVE CHEMICALS FORMED BY MERGER OF 

SURFATHANE CHEMICALS, INC., 7/69. 

I Jo 6 

b7C 


END PAGE THREE 



company manufactures roof 


coatings for mobile, homes and rust-proofing chemicals for 

AUTOMOBILES AND TRUCKS.. EMPLOYS 13 PEOPLE. 


TELEPHONE TOLL RECORDS (CONFIDENTIAL) 


REVIEW OF RECORDS OBTAINED FOR NUMBERS 




AND | I , AND 



ALL OF WHICH ARE ISSUED TO 


SUPRA PROTECTIVE CHEMICALS, INC., FOR THE PERIOD OF 6/29-10/2/73, 
WHICH TOLL RECORDS REFLECT A VOLUMINOUS NUMBER OF CALLS TO AND 
FROM, VARIOUS CITIES. 

END PAGE FOUR 



o 


o 





CV 56-83 
‘ PAGE FIVE 

A REVIEW OF TELEPHONE CALLS PLACED TO WASHINGTON, D.C. 
NUMBERS LOCATED A ONE MINUTE TELEPHONE CALL PLACED AT 8:56 AM 
ON 9/4/73 TO (202) 223-6000, IDENTIFIED AS THE TELEPHONE NUMBER 
FOR THE "WASHINGTON ROST" NEWSPAPER; A ONE MINUTE TELEPHONE 
CALL PLACED SEVERAL MINUTES THEREAFTER AT 9:02 AM, ALSO ON 
9/4/73, TO 737-8200, A NUMBER FOR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF 
JUSTICE; A FIVE MINUTE TELEPHONE CALL PLACED ONE MINUTE LATER 
AT 9:03 AM ON THE SAME DATE TO 655-4000, THE MAIN U.S, 
GOVERNMENT NUMBER. 

AT 9:58 AM ON SAME DATE, 9/4/73, A THREE MINUTE CALL 
IS LISTED TO WASHINGTON, D.C. NUMBER 393-2300, THE MAIN NUMBER 
FOR .SPECIAL PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE. 


ON 9/10/73, AT 10:08 AM, A THREE MINUTE CALL IS LISTED 
TO 638-6565 FOR A LAW FIRM AT 839 17TH STREET, NW, BELIEVED TO 
BE COMPRISED OF 31 PARTNERS, INCLUDING | . 

END PAGE FIVE 


b6 

b7C 



fj 


6 


O 


CV 56-83 
PAGE SIX 

ON 9/18/73, THREE SEPARATE PHONE CALLS ARE LISTED AS 
HAVING BEEN PLACED TO 785-1000, THE HOTEL MADISON, WASHINGTON, 
D.C., INCLUDING A 13 MINUTE CALL AT 7:51 AM; SEVEN MINUTE CALL 
AT 8:32 AM AND A THREE MINUTE CALL AT 11:55 AM. A TEN MINUTE 
CALL TO THAT NUMBER WAS ALSO PLACED AT 9:26 AM ON 9/22/73. 

IN ADDITION, TELEPHONE TOLL CALLS FOR phone[ 

LISTED TO 


BRUNSWICK , OHIO., 


LOCATED APPROXIMATELY .25 MILES SOUTH OF CLEVELAND, .WERE 
OBTAINED WHICH INCLUDED FOLLOWING PHONE CALLS PLACED TO 
WASHINGTON, D.C.: 

A THREE MINUTE CALL IS, LISTED AS HAVING BEEN PLACED 
AT 9:04 AM ON 9/3/73 TO 223-6000, THE "WASHINGTON POST". 

ON' 9/4/73, A 12 MINUTE CALL IS LISTED FOR 3:29 PM. TO 
298-5970, THE LAW FIRM OF BECKER AND GREENWALD, 1701 
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, WASHINGTON, D.C. 

END PAGE SIX 


be 

b7C 


0 


0 


CV 56-83 
PAGE SEVEN 

IN ADDITION, AS NOTED ON THE BUSINESS TELEPHONE RECORDS, 
TELEPHONE NUMBERS ARE ALSO LISTED AS HAVING BEEN PLACED TO 
785-1000, THE HOTEL MADISON, INCLUDING A ONE MINUTE CALL 
AT 5:37, PM ON 9/18/73; A 20 MINUTE CALL AT 2:11 PM ON 9/22/73; 
ONE MINUTE CALL AT 10:00 PM. ON 9/23/73; AND A 30 MINUTE CALL 
AT 11:04 PM ON 9/23/73. 

WITH REGARD TO THE PERTINENT DATES LISTED ABOVE, IT IS 

I REPORTED TO 


BELIEVED THAT 


WASHINGTON, D.C., BEGINNING 9/4/73, IN RESPONSE TO SUBPOENAS 
ISSUED. 


b3 


INTERVIEW. OF 


ON 10/18/73, 


| WAS 'LOCATED AT HIS RESIDENCE 
EXECUTED A WAIVER OF RIGHTS FORM AND FURNISHED FOLLOWING: 
END PAGE SEVEN 


be 

b7C 




0 



<1 


CM 56-83 
PAGE EIGHT 

PRIOR TO BEING ADVISED OF SPECIFIC NATURE, OF CONTACT 
BY CLEVELAND AGENTS, HE INDICATED HE WAS AWARE OF REASON 
AND WAS EXPECTING A VISIT FROM "SOMEBODY", 

LIKELY AGENTS FROM FBI, BASED UPON FACT THAT UPON THE 

FROM WASHINGTON,. D.C. TO 


RETURN OF 


CONTACTED 


CLEVELAND ON SATURDAY,, 10/13/73, 

AT HIS PLANT. AT THAT TIME, ACCORDING TO 
TOLD HIM THAT DURING A CONVERSATION WITH (FNU) 

AND (FNU) 


OF THE 


COX COMMITTEE i 
(PH) 


(PH) OR 


AND 


be 

hlC 


MAY HAVE GIVEN 
had GIVEN 


THE IMPRESSION THAT HEJ 


BELIEVES 


VALUABLE INFO RELATIVE TO COX’S INQUIRY. 

REPRESENTED JOHN DEAN. 


FEELS] 

OF THEIR : CONVERSATION WITH 
END PAGE EIGHT' 


SPECIFICALLY TOLD HIM THE DETAILS 
TO SOMEHOW PREPARE 


l 



r ' 




O 


CV 56-83 
PAGE NINE 

FOR A POSSIBLE INTERVIEW CONCERNING THIS MATTER. 
Explained HE HAS KNOWN 


FOR AT LEAST TEN YEARS AND IS VERY CLOSE TO 
EXTENT THAT 


TO THE 


PERSONALLY VISITS WITH HIM AT LEAST 
THREE TIMES A WEEK AND CALLS HIM MANY- TIMES A DAY, CLAIMING 

CALLS HAD BECOME A nuisance at HIS 

HAS TOLD- HIM ABOUT 


EVEN THAT 


-PLACE OF BUSINESS. 


STATED 


THE $100,000 CONTRIBUTION TO THE CAMPAIGN FUND 

claims 


ITOLD HIM THAT THE CONTRIBUTION AROSE OUT OF, 

WHO 


A DINNER BETWEEN GEORGE M. S.TEINB RENNER AND 
-WAS, CHARACTERIZED BY 


AS A MEMBER OF THE NIXON 
RE-ELECTION COMPAlGN, A BOARD MEMBER OF AMERICAN SHIP 
BUILDING COMPANY, AND FAMILIAR WITH PRESIDENT RICHARD NIXON’S 
FORMER. LAW FIRM IN WASHINGTON, D.C. 

CONCERNING THE CONTRIBUTION, I bLAlMED 


TOLD HIM OF THE FBI INVESTIGATION AND THE FACT THAT EIGHT AMSHIP 
OFFICERS HAD FURNISHED STATEMENTS TO FBI AGENTS. 

END PAGE NINE 


b6 

b7C 



‘PAGE TEN 
NAMED (FNU) | 
INDIVIDUALS HE KNOWS 


AND 


AS 


OHIO, WHO WERE INTERVIEWED BY BUAGENTS AND SUBPOENAED TO 
WASHINGTON, D.C. 



TOLD 


THAT HE, 



WAS 


ADMONISHED BY STEINBRENNER TO STAY AWAY FROM AND HAVE NO CONTACT 
WITH ANY OF THE 


AND RECALLED 


SPECIFICALLY A PHRASE 
after 


HAD TRAVELED TO WASHINGTON, D.C., ALONG WITH] 
LEARNED THAT THE ACCOUNTS OF 


THE CONTRIBUTIONS AS GIVEN BY THE. OFFICERS WERE BASED ON THE*. 
INSTRUCTIONS OF STEINBRENNER AND THAT 


CLAIMED NO 


KNOWLEDGE RE THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE CONTRIBUTIONS. 
MOREOVER* AFTER 


AT WASHINGTON, D.C., THE ATTORNEYS FOR 
AS 


NAMED BY 


RECOMMENDED TO 


THAT HE: OB TAIN HIS OWN ATTORNEY IN HIS OWN BEST INTEREST;, 
AT WHICH TIME, ACCORDING TO I 


TELEPHONED 


AND APPRISED HIM OF WHAT HAD HAPPENED,, WHEREUPON 
TOLD 


THAT THEY, OR STEINBRENNER,, ARE 

TRYING TO "DUMP JT ON YOUR LAP", APPARENTLY REFERRING. TO THE 
END PAGE TEN. 


b 
h 
blC 


CO CD 




CV 56-83 
PAGE ELEVEN 

RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE TURNABOUT IN THE TESTIMONY AND 
POSSIBLY THE ENTIRE COURSE OF THE PROSECUTION. 

ALSO CLAIMED, ’TO HAVE TOLD 


WHEN ASKED 


FOR ADVICE. THAT THERE SHOULD BE NO NEED’ FOR ANYONE TO 
VOLUNTARILY APPEAR IN WASHINGTON, D.C. TO TESTIFY IF THAT 
PERSON HAD DONE NO WRONG 1 . HE ALSO. CLAIMED,,. ON THE .OTHER 
HAND, TO HAVE RECOMMENDED TO 


h3 

•bo 

b7C 


THAT STEINBRENNER 


TESTIFY IN WASHINGTON, .D..C., PRIOR TO ANY. TESTIMONY OF THE' 

AND DO SO VOLUNTARILY BEFORE BEING 


SUBPOENAED, PARTICULARLY IF HE, STEINBRENNER, WERE CONFIDENT 
THAT NO LAW HAD BEEN. VIOLATED. 


REITERATED NUMEROUS TIMES THROUGHOUT INTERVIEW hi 


that; the, advice he furnished 

COMMON SENSE'. 


hlC 


WAS. BASED ON PLAIN 


IN ADDITION, WITH REGARD , TO STEINBRENNER , 

REFERRED 5 TO AN INSTANCE PRIOR TO THE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS 

EXPRESSED CONFIDENCE IN 


AT WASHINGTON, .. D.C. . WHERE 


STEINBRENNER’S INTEGRITY INASMUCH AS STEINBRENNER HAD 

THAT IS, THE FACT 


be 

b7C 


CONFIDED .SOMETHING PERSONAL TO 

THAT STEINBRENNER* S WIFE WAS REPORTEDLY. IN ILL HEALTH • AT 
END PAGE ELEVEN 



CV 56-83 


PAGE TWELVE 
THAT T-IME;,r 


Iexpressed a. desire to meet steinbrenner 


so; that he could evaluate him whereupon [ 

A PRETEXT MEETING ATTENDED' BYl 


J ARRANGED 
I STEINBRENNER, 


FORAMSHIP. THE MEETING, ACCORDING TO 


1.LASTED ABOUT 


ONE HOUR AND' CONCERNED STEINBRENNER’S: SUSPICIONS THAT HIS 
COMPETITION WAS AWARE OF HIS TRAVEL -PLANS AND 
EVERYTHING HE DID AND ALSO SUSPECTED HIS PHONES MIGHT; BE 


TAPPED- PRETEXT WAS THAT 


Ihad SOME KNOWLEDGE RE PHONES. 


■SOMETIME AFTER THE MEETING HAD CONCLUDED, 


TOLD HIM THAT HE, 


]WAS ASKED BY STEINBRENNER AND/OR 
I CONTACT IN WASHINGTON., D.C. 


OFFERED THIS VOLUNTARILY., POSSIBLY AS AN EXPLANATION 


AS TO- THE REASON, FOR 


OR ANY OTHER PERSONS THINKING 


THAT 


IMIGHI HAVE SOME CONTACTS OR, INFLUENCE IN 


WASHINGTON, ; D.C. THIS WAS' NEVER DISCUSSED IN FURTHER' DETAIL, 


READILY ADMITTED HE HAD BEEN IN TELEPHONIC 


CONTACT WITH 


WHILE 


ms IN .WASHINGTON, D.C, 


SPECIFICALLY MENTIONING SEVERAL CALLS TO THE, HOTEL MADISON 


WHERE- 


Istayed, the purpose :being- 


CONTACT WITH HIM AND RETURN CALLS TO FURNISH^ 
END PAGE TWELVE 


JTELEPHO NIC 

Iadvice, 



0 


0 


CV 56-83 
.PAGE THIRTEEN 

AS, A CONFIDANT AND FRIEND AND FOR NO OTHER -REASON. 

ADMITTED CALLING: WASHINGTON, D.C. NEWSPAPERS- TO 
ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN OFFICE PHONE NUMBER OF COX’S 
COMMITTEE., HE CALLED COX’S COMMITTEE TO ASK ANYONE WHO 
WOULD SPEAK WITH HIM AS TO WHETHER OR NOT IT .WOULD NOT BE 
BETTER FOR A MAN TO VOLUNTARILY APPEAR BEFORE 'THE COMMITTEE 
-RATHER THAN BEING SUBPOENAED- PURPOSE OF SUCH: A QUESTION 
WAS THAT HE INTENDED TO GIVE THIS ADVICE TO 


FOR RELAYING' TO STEINBRENNER REGARDING HIS APPEARANCE. AN UNKNOWN 
■MALE WOULD, NOT DISCUSS, THIS, MATTER AND ASKED "ARE YOU 
CALLING FROM CLEVELAND?” AND HE REPLIED NEGATIVELY STATING 
HE -WAS IN WASHINGTON 8 , D.C. :HE ALSO ADMITTED CALLING A 

ItOLD HIM HE COULD LOCATE HIM THROUGH 


LAW, FIRM' AS 


A, LAW FIRM, IDENTITY OF WHICH HE DOES NOT RECALL, THE 
PURPOSE -BEING. TO RETURN A CALL I I MADE TO HIM IN 

CLEVELAND. 

THE HERETOFORE MENTIONED OTHER CALLS: IN WASHINGTON 

DENIED 


WERE FOR SAME PURPOSE,, TO LOCATE | 

THAT HE HAS EVER BEEN IN WASHINGTON., D.C. AND FURTHER, THAT 
END PAGE THIRTEEN. 


b6 

b7C 


PAGE FOURTEEN 

HE KNOWS ANYONE IN WASHINGTON, D.C., INCLUDING STAFF OF 
COX’S COMMITTEE AND HAS NO SOURCE* 

MADE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW latest RESIDENCE 


TELEPHONE BILL AND ADVISED OFFICE PHONE BILL WOULD BE MADE 
AVAILABLE TO AGENTS TOMORROW MORNING:, ,10/19/73. 

RE ALLEGATION THAT I 


HAD CLAIMED THAT 


IF STEINBRENNER APPEARED AT THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE 
AND ACKNOWLEDGED HIS PARTICIPATION IN AN ILLEGAL CAMPAIGN 
CONTRIBUTION, 


pLAIMED HE, DOES NOT RECALL ANY SUCH 

CONVERSATION WHATEVER AND NOTED ONLY THAT HE EXPRESSED 

[THAT IF STEINBRENNER WERE SO CONFIDENT CONCERNING 


TO 

r 

HE INTEGRITY' OF HIS ACTIONS, HE,, AS WELL AS ANY ONE ELSE, 
SHOULD NOT HESITATE TO TAKE SUCH ACTION. 

CONCERNING THE ALLEGATION THAT HE PASSED ON INFORMATION 
THAT THE DOOR TO THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE WOULD STILL 
BE OPEN AS LATE AS 9/18/73, HE ADVISED THAT HE DOES NOT 
RECALL ANY DATE, BUT STATED THIS WAS COMMON SENSE AND. HAD 
ALWAYS ENCOURAGED! 


TO ADVISE STEINBRENNER TO GO IN 


END PAGE FOURTEEN 



CV 56-83 
.PAGE FIFTEEN 




voluntarily. 

CONCERNING ANY CONVERSATION WITH REGARD TO A SETTLEMENT 
OF AN ANTITRUST ACTION AGAINST AMSHIP, BASED ON ACCEPTANCE 
OF DIVESTITURE OF THREE SHIPS AT THAT COMPANY, 


STATED HE DOES NOT RECALL ANY CONVERSATION RE ANY PARTICULAR 
NUMBER OF SHIPS. HE DID NOTE A PREVIOUS ACCOUNT, DATE OR 
MONTH UNRECALLED., WHEREIN ON THE MORNING OF ONE DAY, 

MADE REFERENCE TO THE FILING OF AN ANTITRUST 


CIVIL ACTION IN FEDERAL COURT IN CLEVELAND AGAINST AMSHIP 
WHICH INFO WAS CONFIRMED TO 


BY ANOTHER UNRECALLED AND 


UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL IN CLEVELAND, POSSIBLY BY SOMEONE LIKE 
A CLERK' OF COURT OR OTHER PARTY NOT RECALLED. WHEN 
PRESSED FOR DETAILS AND WHY SOMEONE SHOULD FURNISH 
WITH SUCH INFO, 


KNOWN AS A VERY CLOSE CONFIDANT OF 
AS A HIGH OFFICIAL OF AMSHIP. 


OFFERED THE EXPLANATION THAT HE IS 

WHO IS KNOWN 


WITH REGARD TO ANY CONVERSATION CONCERNING THE 



b6 

blC 


APPROVAL OF A SHIPYARD ACQUISITION BY AMSHIP WHILE THE COMPANY 
END PAGE FIFTEEN 



CV 56-83 
•PAGE SIXTEEN 




WAS UNDER INVESTIGATION, 


OFFERED THE EXPLANATION 


TO THIS AS WELL AS THE OTHER INSTANCES CITED THAT SUCH A 
STANCE BY THE GOVERNMENT WOULD BE LOGICAL.. 

UPON HIS RETURN FROM WASHINGTON, D.C., | INFORMED 

Ithat HE HAD TOLD I 


ABOUT THE ANTITRUST SUIT AND 
TRUE", WHEREUPON 


]THE INFO MENTIONED ABOVE 
HAD SAID " THAT IS NOT 


TRIED TO REFRESH HIS RECOLLECTION 
SAYING "DO N * T YOU REMEMBER ONE OF YOUR FRIENDS MUST HAVE 
TOLD YOU ABOUT THE ANTITRUST SUIT". 

"'ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS, 


REITERATED THAI 


ASKED HIM FOR ADVICE RE INVESTIGATION BEING CONDUCTED OF 
AMSHIP AND DID NOT ASK FOR INFO CONCERNING INVESTIGATION AS 
SAID HE HAD NO INFO. 


HIS, 



SAID 


TOLD HIM THAT WHILE IN WASHINGTON, D.C., 


GAVE HIM, 


A 


POLYGRAPH EXAMINATION AND OBTAINED 36-PAGE STATEMENT. FROM 

ACCORDING TO 


SAID that 


TOLD 


THAT THE COMMITTEE MIGHT REQUEST THAT 



■b6 

b7C 


END PAGE SIXTEEN 



6 


( fS 





CV 56-83 
PAGE SEVENTEEN 


TAKE A SECOND POLYGRAPH: EXAMINATION - 

IT IS NOT KNOWN FROM. REVIEW OF WATERGATE SPECIAL 
PROSECUTION FORCE MEMO DATED 10/15/73, AS TO WHETHER OR NOT 

b3 

be 

b7C 


WITH 


INTERVIEWING AGENTS OF DEFINITE OPINION FROM CONTACT 

HAS BEEN AND IS HEAVILY RELYING 


THAT 


ON ADVICE FROM 


IN THIS MATTER AND IN HIS DAILY 


b6 

b7C 


RESPONSIBILITIES WITH AMSHIP. 
REPORT FOLLOWS. 


END 


LNG FBI HQ CLR TU AR 





Transmit the following in 
AIRTEL 


F B I 

Date: 10/24/73 


(Type in plaintext or code ) 



Via 


(Priority) 


i- 


TO: 

PROM: 

SUBJECT: 


DIRECTOR* FBI (56-4737) 

^SAC* CLEVELAND (56-83) (RUC) 

AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY 
GEORGE M. STEINBRENNER 
ELECTION LAWS 

(ACCOUNTING iN D FRAUD SECTION - 
WATERGATE UNIT) 


Re Cleveland report of SA 


10/24/73. 


Enclosed her ewith are four c onies of referenced 


Cleveland report of SA 

Copies for 

x (Er 
Cleveland 



S3* - 


of 10/24/73. 


re being forwarded separately. 


Bureau (5 nc * U-h^ ‘ofefa 

'T - Cleveland ; ^ | 

MVH/cac /- 'tClU. 

(3) 





9 122 



be 

hlC 






Approved: 



'61 




Sent 



Special Agent in Charge 


GPO : 1970 O - 402-735 



■ ■* 4P 


i?^63.(Hevi.i^72X' -A - 

A ", FEDFRALTiBU RE AU OF INVESTiGATlON'' 


. REPO^TI^G-OFFIC^ 


.OFFICE OF ORION' 


CLEVELAND 


TITLE OF CASE 

O 


‘AMERICAN SHIP BUILDINGS 
COMPANY 

GEORGE MY STEINBRENNER 


.INVESTIGATIVE PERIOD 


10/24/73 -10/17-19/73 


REPORT MADE BY 

' SA 

CHARACTER OF CASE 


ELECTION LAWS 

(ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTIOff - 
WATERGATE UNIT) ( 1 ^ 


REFERENCE- 


w 


Bureau air.tel to Cleveland, i0/17/73> enclosing 
copy of 10/15/73 -request from HENRY S. RUTH, JR.., Special 
Prosecutor's Office. 


Atministrative 


The details of this report represent investigation a / 
conduced by the Cleveland :Di vision in response fo the; mm, f 
•request of October 15> 19.73> of Deputy Special pfo.secutori 17 
‘ ' BENRY S,. RUTH,, JR. to Director/ FBI. - - - I W 

Bureau will hote. that pertinent toll records for 
the business. telephone ^rvljbe and the residence; telephone ^ 

' -ACCOM P LI SH M E N TS V CL*A IM E D " " - * n NONE: -Y " * 1 IIV' 

t : — -'„ ■■■ . ^r r ^ rr — r ACQUIT- CASEHAS BEEN: |JlfC\ 

pONVjiC, * > FOG. , FINES J ^ * . SAVINGS / /RECOVERIES * TALS * K ^ p|I VI 

‘ ' - —vr-v---,^ -y - -rrrTv, ~.cr- r — -r — 1 p£ NO(N <; over ome/e; R nTTO es \ \ 

; l : r p ending prosecution V 

] ‘ ; I ' 1 „ ’ * oVER SIX MONT^y Vp^YES PH 


A PROVED 
CORIES, MADEr 


.SRECIAU AGENTi 
IH” CHARGE 


DO/NOT WRITE IN SPACES BELOW 


4j- Bureau (56-4737); 


2 - WFO 




1 - Cleveland (56r83) 

* PI ssem motion* R e coVftjk f ^AttachVd' Report \ s 

As ~ cn *r ' > 

ReqUest : ; Recl - / ivtlt ' _ L 

Date Fw<L t J 

How Fw<t 1 * \V \T . . . I 


iH : 

&3$im 


Notations' 


m 


COVER PAGE